Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (49679)	3/15/2014 10:41:39 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

"I have, but thanks for at least acknowledging that the Universe does indeed has a cause. You are suggesting that this argument for God’s existence only pushes the question of beginnings one step farther back. However unless you want to argue for an infinite regression you have to land somewhere. Logically the Universe MUST have a first cause." You need to read and think before you talk. I said nothing about the universe having a cause. How could I know? What I pointed out was the flaw in the argument you cut n' pasted. You went from "3) Therefore, the Universe Must Have a Cause (Inferred from the Principal of Causality) TO (4) The First Cause Must Be Eternal and Uncaused (Declared by definition)" There is no connection between those two statements. And all the second one says is IF there is a first cause then it must be a first cause...DUH! Defining a pink unicorn as a unicorn the color pink does not spirit it into existence! Try to think before you post.