SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: epicure who wrote (247388)3/14/2014 8:35:05 AM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 541759
 
OK. Let's put the party politics aside for a second here and just talk about the middle class under Obama. What have we seen? I can tell you that MANY of my friends are contractors. Many used to be employed with big firms. Most are contractors now because they got laid off in the past few years and have come back to some of the same firms as contractors. Their former employers laid them off, because they don't want to pay the increased healthcare costs and SS and Medicare taxes, but they are fine picking them back up as contractors. The kicker for my contractor friends is that the pay isn't bad, but their health care costs have skyrocketed. So holistically, they have taken a step backwards in pay. In most cases, they are paying double under Obamacare, for worse insurance coverage than they had when they are employed. I'm trying to help, by hiring some of these folks back on my team, but there's only so much one person can do. All of these folks are solidly upper middle class, I'd say, with families, kids in school or college, and a heap of weekly bills to pay. Most don't have much savings in the bank nor investments in stocks and most have mortgages to pay.

So who has paid the price from Obama's policies? Well, the middle class has seen their incomes stagnate over the last 6 years of Obama's Presidency, continuing a trend that's been going on for a long while. However, due to Obama's Fed, under Bernanke and now Yellen, the value of a dollar has decline, with the cost of living increasing over the last 6 years, also continuing a trend that's been going on a long while. In addition, with increased taxes on Obamacare, as well as AMT creeping into the middle class, they have also seen their take home pay go down as a result. All of this adds up to a massive middle class squeeze.

Well then, who has benefitted most from Obama's policies? The poor most definitely. They get Obama phones, 5 years of unemployment, food stamps, and a whole host of welfare. The rich most definitely. I'm in the 1% and have most of my wealth in stocks, real estate, and other investments. The last 5 years has been beautifully bountiful to 1%. Our portfolios have expanded nicely with all this Quantitative Easing. Low rates have been nice too, where the 1% has snapped up nice real estate properties at low prices from their cronies, the Big Banks, for renting out at high rents to all those middle class people who lost their homes in 2008-9. I saw that happen in a home right across the street from me. Our upper middle class friends lost their home, a company came in 3 years later and bought it for half the price, and now rents it to a nice family for a healthy rent.

All of this makes me sick and feeling guilty. I'm doing fine, but I see the misery all around me and I know and see and feel viscerally what these Obama and Fed policies are doing. They are enriching the rich and giving welfare to the poor, and DESTROYING the middle class. It's a barbell society and it is terrible for this country over the long run.

Printing money is not a solution. There are only so many times you can slice the pie, before the slivers are too small to mean anything. Endless zero percent interest rates to the big banks only enriches the big banks. It doesn't help anyone over the long run. Giveaways to people who aren't working doesn't help the guy who's working 3 jobs to make ends meet. This Obamacare has some great elements to it like no denials for pre-existing conditions and no health care maximums, etc, but it has bludgeoned the middle class. Obama's economic policies are not based on building a society of people who want to be self reliant and work hard. It is based on a misguided concept that we need a nanny state and none of us should worry if we don't have a job, because the government will take care of us.

It's time for all of us to recognize that our government needs to live within it's means and that we can't be the world's police and the world's piggy bank. We've lost our way, our morals, and we're throwing out the baby with the bathwater when we embrace socialism and kick capitalism to the curb.



To: epicure who wrote (247388)3/14/2014 8:45:09 AM
From: RetiredNow  Respond to of 541759
 
Oh and btw, how about Obama on fighting crime among the Big Banks? Not much action there either. These Big Banks have destroyed our economy, profited from it, and many of their executives are still running them and pocketing hundreds of millions off the free money they get from the Fed. Is Obama doing anything about that, even when the Big Banks are caught in mortgage fraud, laundering drug money, and manipulating key markets? Nope. You see, Obama picks and chooses which laws he wants to execute, which is a violation of his oath of office to execute all laws faithfully. When we become a nation of men, instead a nation of laws, we're in deep trouble, because then we are all subject to people's opinions and we are not protected by the rule of law.

------------
U.S. Criticized for Lack of Action on Mortgage Fraud

dealbook.nytimes.com

Four years after President Obama promised to crack down on mortgage fraud, his administration has quietly made the crime its lowest priority and has closed hundreds of cases after little or no investigation, the Justice Department’s internal watchdog said on Thursday.

The report by the department’s inspector general undercuts the president’s contentions that the government is holding people responsible for the collapse of the financial and housing markets. The administration has been criticized, in particular, for not pursuing large banks and their executives.

“In cities across the country, mortgage fraud crimes have reached crisis proportions,” Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. said at a mortgage fraud summit in Phoenix in 2010. “But we are fighting back.”

The inspector general’s report, however, shows that the F.B.I.considered mortgage fraud to be its lowest-ranked national criminal priority. In several large cities, including New York and Los Angeles, F.B.I. agents either ranked mortgage fraud as a low priority or did not rank it at all.

The F.B.I. received $196 million from the 2009 to 2011 fiscal years to investigate mortgage fraud, the report said, but the number of pending cases and agents investigating them dropped in 2011.

“Despite receiving significant additional funding from Congress to pursue mortgage fraud cases, the F.B.I. in adding new staff did not always use these new positions to exclusively investigate mortgage fraud,” the report says.

Mortgage fraud was one of the causes of the 2008 financial collapse. Mortgage brokers and lenders falsified documents, sometimes to make mortgages look safer, other times to make the property look more valuable.

The inspector general focused much of its report and most of its recommendations on fixing internal systems that produced inaccurate data that wildly overstated the government’s results.

Mr. Holder, for example, announced in 2012 that prosecutors had charged 530 people over the previous year in cases related to mortgage fraud that had cost homeowners more than $1 billion.

Almost immediately, the Justice Department realized it could not back up those statistics, the inspector general said. After months of review, it became clear that only 107 people were charged.

The $1 billion figure, it turned out, had been drastically inflated. It was actually $95 million, the inspector general said. Yet Justice Department officials repeated those claims for months, even after it was obvious the figures were wrong, the inspector general said.

The Justice Department contested the inspector general’s findings, noting that the number of mortgage fraud indictments and convictions roughly doubled from 2009 to 2011. In 2012, the government reached a $25 billion civil settlement with the nation’s five largest mortgage servicers.

“The facts regarding the department’s work on mortgage fraud tell a much different story than this report,” a department spokeswoman, Ellen Canale, said. “As the report itself notes, even at a time of constrained budget resources, the department has dedicated significant manpower and funding to combating mortgage fraud.”

Last year, the Justice Department announced a $13 billion settlement with JPMorgan Chase over the bank’s questionable mortgage practices.

The Justice Department agreed with the recommendations to improve the record keeping that produce such figures.

Members of Congress and others have criticized the Obama administration for going too easy on Wall Street banks and not taking mortgage fraud seriously enough.

“The inspector general’s report sheds light on what looks like an attempt by the Justice Department to pull the wool over the public’s eyes with respect to its efforts to go after the wrongdoers involved in mortgage fraud,” Senator Charles E, Grassley, Republican of Iowa and the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a statement. “According to the inspector general, the department wasted time cooking the numbers about the cases it pursued, when it should have been prosecuting cases.”