Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Provectus Pharmaceuticals Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: boomertree2 who wrote (12723)	3/17/2014 2:15:02 PM
From: jkrywyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13111

Saying, essentially, you're wrong but i don't have the time or patience to explain it is a bit lazy. Regardless, it's absurd to think of getting management out. If you were long and had a problem with compensation, you should have said something as it was happening, rallied people not to vote for it. It's pretty petty to make it an issue now. Yes, it is the shareholder's company. All 16,000.... It's not your company. And it's their company to run unless shareholders say otherwise. I'm fine with management. Not perfect - but you can't have your cake and eat it too. Can't have a big upside potential and value without some issues or risk.

To: boomertree2 who wrote (12723)	3/17/2014 2:16:57 PM
From: jkrywyn	Respond to of 13111

It is not ludicrous. This is a settlement. They are obliging to settle... If it were me, I'd fight it. But they know it would hurt shareholders and the stock in general, I'd imagine. What if your company decided you were paid too much two years ago, despite having gotten approval and the check in the mail...and took you to court. I understand people don't like to think of things from other peoples' perspective. But it would help with your anger and outrage to consider it...