Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (775007)	3/15/2014 11:06:09 AM
From: tbolding	Respond to of 1573531

Obama’s popularity at an all-time low — Putin’s at an all-time high—Warmonger Kerry learns a new word “sovereignty” — oh, my! by George W. Berry NATO’s bombing and shelling Serbia with depleted uranium while the Rothschilds salivated over Kosovo’s mineral wealth was legal … but people voting in Crimea to join Russia ”violates international law”. Ousting a democratically-elected Ukrainian government by foreign-financed (Rothschild/Soros) thugs was legal – but the will of the overwhelming majority of the Crimean People is of no consequence. They want the Black Sea to be a NATO lake. They want to put missiles in the Ukraine pointed down Russia’s throat. Paul Craig Roberts said to me in one of our interviews that they want to surround Russia (not Iran) with “defensive” missiles – (for the stated purpose of defending against non existent Iranian missiles) – so they can in reality launch a first strike against Russia. That’s right – The Zio-Cons want to START W.W. 3! God help us! – We all need a man like Putin to prevent W.W. 3. A Russian song – One like Putin – demonstrates a level of popularity unknown to Obama: youtube.com Edgar Cayce said: “In Russia there comes the hope of the world, not as that sometimes termed of the communistic, or Bolshevik, no; but freedom, freedom! That each man will live for his fellow man! The principle has been born. It will take years for it to be crystallised, but out of Russia comes again the hope of the world.” (Edgar Cayce, 1944, No. 3976-29) “… for changes are coming, this may be sure an evolution, or revolution in the ideas of religious thought. The basis of it for the world will eventually come out of Russia; not communism, no! But rather that which is the basis of the same, as the Christ taught ” His kind of communism!” (Edgar Cayce, c. 1930, No. 452-6) “On Russia’s religious development will come the greater hope of the world. Then that one or group that is the closer in its relationship [with Russia] may fare the better in gradual changes and final settlement of conditions as to the rule of the world.” (Edgar Cayce, c.1932) “[In Russia] a new understanding has come and will come to a troubled people.” (Edgar Cayce, c.1938) Communist America – Capitalist Russia: The Second Plank of Karl Marx’ Communist Manifesto is, “2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.” A 13 percent Flat Tax is Freedom from Debt-Slavery. America is drowning in Private Central Bank (“Federal” Reserve) debt. Russia’s economy is booming. The United States has the Communist tax system of Karl Marx. Russia has the Capitalist 13 percent flat tax rate.

To: longnshort who wrote (775007)	3/16/2014 3:00:44 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573531

The CBO Report...... Effects of the $10.10 Option on Employment and Income. Once fully implemented in the second half of 2016, the $10.10 option would reduce total employment by about 500,000 workers, or 0.3 percent, CBO projects. As with any such estimates, however, the actual losses could be smaller or larger; in CBO’s assessment, there is about a two-thirds chance that the effect would be in the range between a very slight reduction in employment and a reduction in employment of 1.0 million workers (see Ta b l e 1 ) . Many more low-wage workers would see an increase in their earnings. Of those workers who will earn up to $10.10 under current law, most—about 16.5 million, according to CBO’s estimates—would have higher earn- ings during an average week in the second half of 2016 if the $10.10 option was implemented. 1 Some of the people earning slightly more than $10.10 would also have higher earnings under that option, for reasons discussed below. Further, a few higher-wage workers would owe their jobs and increased earnings to the heightened demand for goods and services that would result from the minimum- wage increase. 1. In addition to the people who became jobless, some workers earning less than $10.10 per hour and not covered by minimum- wage laws would also not have increased earnings