SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (775211)3/16/2014 6:27:31 PM
From: combjelly1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1576866
 
Not bullshit at all.

The MSM would be happy to cover those "scandals". In fact, they did. When nothing panned out, they moved on. That is what happens when there is no real basis for covering it. If there was some actual meat there instead of fluff, they would still be on it. The media loves scandals. It means more viewers. I grant you they were more responsive during the Clinton years. But, y'all burned them. So they aren't quite as gullible now. Which is not to say they aren't gullible at all. They still are. But when things flame out now, they move on.

Look at the panels on the ABC, CBS, NBC Sunday morning news shows.

Yes, look at them. Almost everyone who is brought on is a conservative. And it is the same ones, over and over. Not so with those even slightly to the left of the most popular ones.

Look at Candy Crowley during the Obama/Romney debate. If that isn't an example of extreme liberal bias I don't know what is

Ok, so you don't know what bias is. She was moderating a debate. It was starting to bog down into "he said/she said". She brought up the relevant facts to get the debate back on track. Which is part of what moderators do. Otherwise, they would just flash questions up on the screen. Just because you and your wingnut cohorts want to edit reality, it doesn't make that stuff actually real.