SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Broken_Clock who wrote (775655)3/19/2014 1:44:37 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578927
 
<<crock of lying bs kaon. Not only have you and the other O-cultists defended Obummercare, even Bill Moyers has been on record proving O himself shafted single payer.

I have posted a zillion times Obama shafted single payer. Read my last few posts.

I wonder at times if your elevator goes all the way to the top



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (775655)3/19/2014 3:25:04 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578927
 
<<crock of lying bs kaon. Not only have you and the other O-cultists defended Obummercare, even Bill Moyers has been on record proving O himself shafted single payer.>>

You accused me of lying. I have posted many times O left single payer on the table.

Now, do you want to apologize to me.



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (775655)3/19/2014 9:23:57 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1578927
 
<<crock of lying bs kaon. Not only have you and the other O-cultists defended Obummercare, even Bill Moyers has been on record proving O himself shafted single payer.>>

I never said Obama didn't lay down on single payer. I have said he did over and over.

So you are lying when you said I said that. What does your sentence say,?

But he had a reason, it was because he thought he could get a Republican health program through better with the pubs.

So the pubs did force Obamacare on us. If not for them we would have gone for single payer.

Is that too much for you to understand? You are so frustrating.

So let me lay it out so maybe you can grasp it.

1) We liberals were/are angry Obama did not fight for single payer.

2) But it was because Obama felt pubs would go to the mats if he tried to get single payer. Look what they have done with their own heath program.

3) But we feel it is better than nothing.

Can you grasp all of that, or is it too god damn complex? Try thinking for two minutes.

And people need Health insurance. Of course pubs don't care if they die in the street. Which they are doing without health insurance.