SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dennis Roth who wrote (183106)3/19/2014 4:13:35 PM
From: Bearcatbob7 Recommendations

Recommended By
Billy Bilgewasser
isopatch
Joe Wesley
NWrailfan
old tx oiler

and 2 more members

  Respond to of 206178
 
We have discussed Cove Point before. I have expressed my opinion before. As I have said I participated in the project to restart the facility as an import facility, Currently I have absolutely no stake in Dominion other than they bill me for gas provided by a third party.

Let it simply be said that our nation is at war with basic economic sanity.

American jobs? Efficient use of invested capital(what an absolute novel thought)? Such things are irrelevant to those who purport so loudly to claim about the least among us. Those of you who do not like my commentary on this issue - just think. Do you really care about the well being of the economic disadvantaged or only the con that gets their votes? I do not think you guys give a damn about anything but the con.

Bob



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (183106)3/20/2014 8:50:00 AM
From: Dennis Roth1 Recommendation

Recommended By
evestor

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206178
 
Are Natural-Gas Exports the Next Keystone?
blogs.wsj.com

---

The comments are interesting. McKibben's not winning the argument.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (183106)5/7/2014 12:04:48 PM
From: Dennis Roth1 Recommendation

Recommended By
evestor

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206178
 
Maryland LNG terminal draws fire
Advocates file complaint with SEC over environmental risks.
By Daniel J. Graeber | May 7, 2014 at 9:54 AM

...Environmental advocacy groups As You Sow, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Earthjustice and Trillium Asset Management filed a complaint with the Securities and Exchange Commission saying Dominion withheld evidence when it filed the forms necessary for an initial public offering of stock.

The groups said in their 49-page complaint the SEC registration from Dominion "potentially" lacked a sufficient environmental risk assessment and downplayed the company's ability to "generate stable and consistent cash flow."

There was no public statement from Dominion on the complaint...

Read more: upi.com

====

Interesting in that now they want to get the Securities and Exchange Commission involved in the fight, but I don't see how this stops or even delays the project.



To: Dennis Roth who wrote (183106)5/15/2014 3:21:53 PM
From: Dennis Roth1 Recommendation

Recommended By
isopatch

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 206178
 
Dominion LNG export project clears U.S. environmental review
Posted on May 15, 2014 at 12:02 pm by Bloomberg fuelfix.com

Dominion Cove Point LNG Project Passes FERC Environmental Assessment Review
Published on Thursday, 15 May 2014 10:14 lngglobal.com

FERC says approval of Dominion Cove Point LNG Project would NOT constitute an action affecting the quality of the environment.

===

The only major remaining hurtle to the project will be a ruling by the Maryland Public Service Commission, which will determine whether the plan's additional power generation is in the “ public interest” and thereby merits approval.

I received a tweet from someone at the hearing by the Maryland Public Service Commission held on the day of
the big Baltimore Anti-Fracking march against the proposed Cove Point project inthesetimes.com that M.P.S.C. would NOT consider the fracking issue in making its
decision. It is unlikely, IMHO, that they would consider some of the specious Global Warming arguments against
the project considering that the exported LNG would likely displace coal burning overseas. The project has
near unanimous support by local Southern Maryland government. The opponents have appealed to the Obama Administration, but given the current political climate in Washington as a result of the Ukraine Crisis, it is unlikely the Obama Administration would dream up an reason to block this LNG export project. Only our term-limited, presidentially ambitious, Governor could find some extraordinary means to stop it in order to suck up to the Greens prior to the Dem presidential primaries. Such a blatant political move without some
scientific cover from a creditable environmental review is unlikely, IMO, because it could cost him politically more than it would gain.