SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/22/2014 4:31:23 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Common Core is Uncommonly Bad Ed. Policy

.............................................................................
Townhall.com ^ | March 22, 2014 | Chad Mathis




To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/23/2014 12:46:24 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 16547
 
The State Department is complaining about the ballot used in the election to see if Crimea should succeed from the Ukraine having no option for a No vote, but the administration saw no problem forcing Obamacare on the American people and sees no problem with the president using his “pen and phone” to force new rules and regulations on the American people without no vote.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/26/2014 1:56:28 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
Mevis

  Respond to of 16547
 
Indiana becomes first state to scrap Common Core
.............................................................................................
March 25, 2014
FoxNews.com

INDIANAPOLIS – Indiana has become the first of 45 states to opt out of the national education standard known as Common Core, and critics of the controversial K-12 program say the move could "open the floodgates" for others to follow.

Growing criticism over costs imposed by the program, as well as fears that by setting a national education standard, the program has already begun dictating curriculum, has made Common Core an increasingly polarizing issue. Although the program has both Republican and Democrat supporters, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence predicted his state will be the first of many to rethink participation.

"I believe when we reach the end of this process there are going to be many other states around the country that will take a hard look at the way Indiana has taken a step back, designed our own standards and done it in a way where we drew on educators, we drew on citizens, we drew on parents and developed standards that meet the needs of our people," Pence said...

Full Story



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/26/2014 8:23:59 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
8 examples of Common Core teaching that range from criminally negligent to treason

Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:02:47 PM · by The Looking Spoon · 2 replies
The Looking Spoon ^ | 3-26-14 | The Looking Spoon





To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/26/2014 8:25:16 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
As Obama Dismisses Russia As "Regional," It Expands Its Reach

Wednesday, March 26, 2014 8:23:52 PM · by jazusamo
Investors.com ^ | March 26, 2014 | IBD Editorial





To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/27/2014 5:39:14 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Missouri Teacher Tearfully Describes Bullying She Suffered for Opposing Common Core (Video)

....................................................................................
The Missouri Torch ^ | 3-27-2014 | Duane Lester

"We were told in my building, and I quote, 'Be careful about what you post on Facebook, or talk about in the public regarding Common Core. Don't say anything negative. It could affect your job.'" Despite others being intimidated into silence, Kimball continued to speak out.

"When I turned in a personal day request to come support the rally for House Bill 1490, I was asked by my principal, 'Do you really want that in your personnel file?' And then I was bullied and ostracized by my administration, a few other teachers and the president of the school board. And that continues today," Kimball said.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/27/2014 6:55:53 PM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Honey_Bee
The1Stockman

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/27/2014 7:48:03 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama Makes Two Major Foreign Policy Gaffes on Europe Trip
....................................................................................

by Raheem Kassam and Andre Walker 27 Mar 2014
breitbart.com

After falsely claimed that Kosovo held a UN-assisted referendum on self-determination, he then wrongly said that Georgia was not being considered for NATO membership. Speaking on Kosovo yesterday, Obama said : "...Kosovo only left Serbia after a referendum was organised not outside the boundaries of international law, but in careful cooperation with the United Nations and with Kosovo’s neighbours. None of that even came close to happening in Crimea."

But none of it came close to happening in Kosovo either, as Milos Subotic, the International Relations Officer of the University of Pristina, Kosovo told Breitbart London.

"During his yesterday speech in Brussels, President Obama showed a lack of knowledge of the political situation in Kosovo. Kosovo never organised any kind of referendum, but the Assembly of Provisional Institutions of self-government of Kosovo made a unilateral declaration of independence on February 17th 2008.

"The declaration of independence has been recognised by approximately one hundred states, however Serbia and many countries have also showed their opposition to declaration of independence, most notably China and Russia. What Kosovo did was not in line with United Nations and that’s confirmed by the fact that Kosovo is not member of UN."

Dr. James Ker-Lindsay, a Senior Research Fellow on the Politics of South East Europe at the London School of Economics took to Twitter to correct the U.S. President before telling Breitbart London: "I think one must assume that this was indeed an error. However, it really does seem to be an incredible mistake to have made. Surely there must have been someone at hand who would have known that there was no UN organised referendum in Kosovo. It really was not that long ago.

"It will certainly play into the hands of those who believe that the United States is now trying to rewrite history to put a better gloss on its own actions.

"It will be interesting to see if a retraction or correction is issued by the White House."

If messing up on Kosovo wasn’t enough, Obama has now also potentially undermined Georgia’s application to join NATO.

Speaking at the press conference after the EU-US summit yesterday the US President wrongly suggested that Georgia "is not currently on a path to NATO membership". In fact the country has been on the path to membership since 2008.

At the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest that year the attending Heads of State and Government agreed the following statement: "NATO welcomes Georgia’s Euro-Atlantic aspirations for membership in NATO. We agreed today that they will become members of NATO."

Former Georgian Ambassador to London Giorgi Badridze, told Breitbart London: "President Obama's remarks could hardly have come at a worse time – or have been formulated in a worse manner.

"Firstly, it's wrong to link Georgia's aspirations for NATO membership with those of Ukraine. Georgia has been working hard to achieve more progress in that direction, while Ukraine formally withdrew from the process years ago.

"The second – and most damaging - thing the President said is that Georgia and Ukraine are 'not currently on a path to NATO membership'. This ignores the fact NATO made a firm commitment to admitting Georgia at the Bucharest Summit back in 2008.

"Thirdly, stating Russian opposition as a reason for halting Georgian progress towards NATO membership will only embolden Moscow and strengthen its view that it has a right to effectively veto enlargement – a dangerous precedent.

"Putin's tanks are positioned along the border with Eastern Ukraine, Crimea is under occupation and Putin has long been looking for a reason to finish the job he never had the chance to finish in 2008: terminating Georgia’s independence. Against that backdrop, Obama'’s comments were not only unfortunate but, in the context of regional security, dangerous."

Daniel Hamilton, a UK-based Foreign Policy expert, told Breitbart London: "Over the past sixty-five years, NATO has more than proved its worth as a guarantor of peace, stability and security in Europe.

"The 1999 and 2004 expansions waves that brought in former Warsaw Pact states in Central Europe and the Baltics demonstrated that NATO is a work in progress – not just a Western European club.

"The prospect – and later, promise - of NATO membership has been a key driver in Georgia's transformation from failed post-Soviet backwater to pro-western success story. For Obama to claim Georgian NATO membership is off the table at a time when the country faces vast existential threats from Russia not only emboldens Moscow but undermines western influence in the region.

“NATO’s collective security guarantee served as a powerful deterrent to the expansionist impulses of the Soviet Union. So too, should it serve as a deterrent to Putin’s Russia of 2014. We must stand with Georgia".

President Obama's comments have overshadowed his visit to Europe and are likely to raise serious questions about his administration’s ability to deliver a strong united foreign policy.





To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/31/2014 12:44:48 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 16547
 
This second grader’s revenge against Common Core math will make your day

......................................................................
Yahoo/Daily Caller ^ | Mar 30, 2014





To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)3/31/2014 5:18:58 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Common Core Asks Kids to Choose Two Amendments to Remove From Bill of Rights

.....................................................................
IJReview ^ | 03/31/2014 | Emily Hulsey



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/1/2014 4:01:46 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Outrage: Students who are opted out of Common Core testing will have to ‘sit and stare’
....................................................................................
April 1, 2014 by BEN VELDERMAN

Archive»

MARION, N.Y. – The controversy surrounding the new Common Core-aligned standardized tests is causing some New York school leaders to act as childish and immature as the students they are supposed to be leading.



13WHAM.com reports at least 16 school districts in the Empire State have implemented a “sit and stare” policy for students who’ve been opted-out of the state assessments by their parents.

These students “will have to sit at their desks without any other reading or testing materials, while all the students around them take the 60- to 90-minute exams,” the news site reports.

It’s not difficult to read between the lines here. The “sit and stare” policy is a way petty and vindictive school principals and superintendents can get back at parents who are pushing back against the Common Core experiment.

The parents are making the school leaders’ lives more difficult, so they’re going to return the favor – by making the children pay.

That’s not just our interpretation of what’s happening; the leader of the state’s largest teachers union sees it the same way.

“This (‘sit and stare’) policy aimed at students whose parents elect to ‘opt out’ their children from state standardized testing is unconscionable,” said Richard Iannuzzi, president of the New York State United Teachers, in a February press release.

“This is cruel to those students not taking the exam and a distraction and disservice to those who are attempting to complete it,” Iannuzzi added. “Punishing or embarrassing children because their parents exercised their right to choose not to have their children participate in tests they consider inappropriate is, frankly, abusive.”

Kathryn Wegman, the superintendent of one of the “sit and stare” districts, defended the policy by noting state law does not contain a provision that allows parents to opt their children out of state-required tests.

But one expert on the subject recently told Joy Pullman of the Heartland Institute that there’s not a state in the nation “that has a ‘no opt-out’ clause” in its law. In other words, what state law doesn’t forbid, parents can do. That means opting out of the test is their legal privilege.

Wegman offered more excuses for the “sit and stare” policy. She told 13WHAM.com that the district does not have the right, nor the staff and space, to provide an alternative setting for opt-out students during test days, which are set to occur this month.

That seems like a flimsy excuse to us. Most districts have a small army of aides and office employees who could monitor the opt-out students. And if they don’t have the manpower, why can’t Wegman and other K-12 leaders get some parent volunteers to help out for a few hours during test days?

As for the space limitations – it seems most schools could find some space in the cafeteria, library and gymnasium to accommodate the students who aren’t taking the test.

Leaders in “sit and stare” schools aren’t showing much imagination in this process because their goal isn’t to solve the problem. Rather, it’s to punish the children of uncooperative (and free thinking) parents.

That’s reprehensible and parents and taxpayers should pressure their elected school board members to take corrective action against any school employee who would use such tactics.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/2/2014 10:58:04 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Stephen Colbert, Racist: The unfunny “comedian” mocks Asians and calls it satire.
..........................................................................
National Review ^ | 04/02/2014 | Michelle Malkin


Question: Who are the most prominent public purveyors of Asian stereotypes and ethnic language-mocking in America?

The right answer is liberal Hollywood and Democrats.

The wrong and slanderous answer is conservatives, which is what liberal performance artist/illegal-alien-amnesty lobbyist Stephen Colbert wants Americans to believe. Last week on his Comedy Central show, Colbert resurrected his “satirical” 2005 “Ching-Chong Ding-Dong” skit, in which he speaks in pidgin English with a grossly exaggerated accent. He used it in a boneheaded attempt to ridicule Republican football team owner Dan Snyder and others who defend the Washington Redskins’ name.

“Oh, I ruv tea. It’s so good for you. You so pretty, American girl,” Colbert, in his conservative talk-show host persona, jibber-jabbers in the 2005 segment. “You come here. You kiss my tea make her sweet. I need no sugar when you around. Come on my rickshaw, I give you a ride to Bangkok.” Forward to 2014: To mock Snyder’s recent creation of a foundation to benefit Native Americans, Colbert replayed the skit and jeered in character that he was “willing to show the Asian community that I care by introducing the Ching-Chong Ding-Dong Foundation for Sensitivity to Orientals or Whatever.”

Last week, a group of diehard liberals, led by young Korean-American writer Suey Park, gave Colbert a hard time about his cringe-worthy act, which was accompanied by an awkward laugh track and left the distinct impression that the real Colbert enjoys crude ethnic-language mockery just a little too much.

Park and her liberal Twitter followers tenaciously questioned Colbert’s use of “satire” that ends up stoking the racism it purports to mock and abhor. They obviously picked the incendiary #CancelColbert hashtag to force attention to their complaints. My view is and always has been that the answer to speech you disagree with is more and better speech. For me, #CancelColbert wasn’t about censoring his show. It was about exposing his hypocrisy and don’t-you-understand-satire double standards.

Park complained that Colbert and his defenders are race-baiting liberals who hide behind their self-professed progressivism. Absolutely. Progressives of pallor — hipster racists — have said and done some of the most bigoted things I’ve ever witnessed in my life, and they’ve gotten away with it. And as one viewer noted, Colbert “obviously didn’t use satire very effectively, because most people aren’t talking about the Redskins issue or Dan Snyder.” Indeed, many of his fans were too busy tweeting non-satirical anti-Asian bigotry, misogyny, and ugly death threats.

I’m not surprised at many on the right who tripped over themselves to side with the entertainment industry Cool People — or “coolists,” as Greg Gutfeld brilliantly captures them in his new book, Not Cool. In elite circles, it is uncool to say you think Stephen Colbert is unfunny. The suck-ups go along with Colbert’s painfully inane Ching-Chong Ding-Dong schtick because they want to show they “get” Cool Colbert’s “satire.”

Wake up. These smug liberal elites are not your allies in the fight against political correctness run amok. Colbert and company marginalize conservatism while laughing all the way to the bank. Why would conservatives enable them? Gutfeld explains: “Pick a political, cultural, or moral universe, and in each one it’s the cool who seek to punish, mock, or thwart the uncool. They do this freely and without much resistance, for exacting cool revenge is so common that the uncool let it happen without a fight — a sort of cultural Stockholm syndrome.”

Asians are also convenient, “uncool” punching bags. Unlike offended Muslim fanatics (see “The Mohammed Cartoons”), they’re not going to issue fatwas, threaten beheadings, or blow themselves up. Coward Colbert and his cable-news persona would never dare offend the jihad-friendly brigade at CAIR; the only jabs he takes are at “Islamophobe” conservatives who worry about the poisonous spread of sharia law.

Colbert defenders “circled the wagons,” as Rush Limbaugh pointed out on Monday, by griping instead about Limbaugh’s 18-second imitation on radio of a Chinese government translator in 2011. “Notice how to get this guy out of the mess that he’s in — apparently they have to link him to me. Why? I don’t know.”

Colbert needs partisan sycophants to go along with his selective clown-nose act, every step of the way, to provide him total immunity as he scrapes the bottom of the “comedy” barrel to portray the Right as racist. Blaming Rush (or lazily mocking my 2004 book on internment, profiling, and national security, as Colbert did on his show Monday night) deflects from the genuine offense taken by Park and other liberals at Colbert’s widespread dissemination of yellowface caricatures.

The Comedy Central political operatives need to make conservatives the demons so his audience forgets that liberal actress Rosie O’Donnell gratuitously mocked “ching-chong” accents on the mainstream ABC network show The View while her liberal co-hosts and audience yukked it up.

Or that Vice President Joe Biden mocked Indian accents in a 2012 jobs speech in New Hampshire and complained in 2008 on the campaign trail that “you cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent. I’m not joking.”

Or that former secretary of state and leading 2016 Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton repeatedly has employed a degrading Southern accent to pander to black voters. (Google “I ain’t noways tired.”)

Or that Democrat Bob Beckel made fun of Louisiana GOP governor Bobby Jindal’s State of the Union response address by likening it to a “call-center ad in Mumbai.”

Or that mainstream Hollywood productions from Breakfast at Tiffany’s (Mickey Rooney’s I. Y. Yunioshi) to Sixteen Candles (Long Duk Dong) to the sitcoms How I Met Your Mother (an entire show in yellowface) and 2 Broke Girls (Han Lee) have done more to disseminate and profit off cheap, vulgar, bucktoothed Asian stereotypes than Rush Limbaugh ever did.

It’s not the outrage that’s manufactured, but Colbert’s sanctimonious myth of left-wing purity and his phony indictment of conservatives as the predominant forces of intolerance in America.

But what do I know, Mr. Colbert? Me so stupid. You so funny.

— Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/3/2014 8:37:26 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 16547
 
In a series of instances we have seen the gatekeepers of civil society attack those who hold the view that marriage is between a man and a woman — Chick-fil-A, Barilla Pasta, Craig James (who was fired from ESPN), and “Duck Dynasty” patriarch Phil Robertson.

This kind of grotesque incivility is toxic for any democratic community.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/4/2014 11:22:11 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 16547
 
Obama Tackled in the End Zone--What on earth is this man boasting about?
..............................................................................
Townhall.com ^ | April 4, 2014 | David Limbaugh


It's one thing to spike the football when you actually score a touchdown, but why is Obama celebrating in the end zone when he just got tackled for a safety?

What on earth is this man boasting about? Boasting is obnoxious enough when the braggart in question has accomplished something, but how many people do you know who brag when they've hurt millions?

Under the goal posts in the Rose Garden, Obama said: Obamacare "is doing what it's supposed to do; it's working. ... The debate over repealing this law is over; the Affordable Care Act is here to stay. ... I've got to admit, I don't get it. Why are folks working so hard for people not to have health insurance? Why are they so mad about the idea of folks having health insurance?"

This is outrageous, even for him.

If Obamacare is doing what it's supposed to do, then it was supposed to create chaos in the health care industry, increase our premiums, cause people to lose their doctors, reduce the quality of care and cost the government unconscionable sums of money.

Is that what Obama means by "it's working"? Is this what he envisioned that Obamacare would do?

If not, then why is he all puffed up? Why aren't Democrats sharing in his triumphant bliss? Why is he attacking those who are rightly criticizing this policy?

Obama looked us in the eye and said 7.1 million people have signed up for Obamacare, which is apparently close to the projected number of enrollees necessary to fund this boondoggle. But for that number to work -- even if you assume it is legitimate -- it has to be a net number.

What Obama didn't tell us is that this figure, in the abstract, means nothing. By throwing out 7.1 million as if it means the administration has met its goal, he is deliberately and brazenly deceiving the American people, because he knows it has not come close. The fact that he would take no questions on this matter is proof that he has something to hide.

It's as if Obama and his advisers were sitting around the table -- or the putting green -- and he told them, "Hey, we've almost reached the magic number of sign-ups." One of his advisers might have said, "Yes, but we're miles away from our goal." And Obama might have said: "Who cares? This is enough for a sound bite. This is enough for a press conference. This is enough to dupe the American people. Don't question me. Schedule that press conference. I'm the president."

In order for Obamacare to work, it needed some 7 million net new enrollees, at least 38 percent of whom would be young and healthy enough to subsidize the others, according to liberal projections.

But what did he get?

Well, he allegedly got 7.1 million enrollees on paper, but let's look at the myriad ways that number is reduced.

National Journal reports that an estimated 15 to 20 percent of these enrollees haven't paid their premiums, which means they won't be covered. So right off the bat, you have to reduce the number to between 5.7 million and 6 million, which means the figures already won't work.

Instead of 38 percent of these enrollees being in the young and healthy category, Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute reports that less than 30 percent of enrollees are younger than 35.

Also, RAND Corp. estimates that only about one-third of the new enrollees were previously uninsured, which means that two-thirds of the 5.7 million or 6 million cannot properly be counted in these figures. So we have fewer than 2 million net new enrollees. But we're still not finished.

In addition to this, RAND estimates that nearly a million more people lost their plan because of Obamacare and couldn't afford to replace it because Obamacare mandates coverage of additional risks and causes premiums to increase.

Does that mean we are actually down to about 1 million net new enrollees?

Not to destroy your day further, but on top of all this, Obamacare is projected to cost the government -- meaning taxpayers -- $2 trillion over the next decade, which isn't even being factored in here. And how many believe that number isn't grossly underestimated? Also, Obamacare is going to cause cuts to Medicare Advantage, which will reduce benefits or increase premiums for people by an estimated $35 to $75 per month.

As you can see, Obama is giving you only a fraction of the information you need to understand this picture and imparting the false impression that Obamacare is working now, and when premiums skyrocket next year, he can scapegoat the insurance companies and proceed to his beloved single-payer, full-blown statist scenario.

Obama must be still counting on the fact that he can fool enough of the people enough of the time -- Election Day every two years -- to continue his sinister plan to fundamentally transform this nation.

The polls are screaming that he's finally run out of juice.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/4/2014 7:22:32 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Islamic group gets go-ahead to cut crosses off NY church

....................................................................
AP via FoxNews ^ | April 3, 2014




March 30, 2014: This photo shows the former Holy Trinity Roman Catholic Church in Syracuse, N.Y. The church will soon be called Masjid Eisa Ibn Marya - The Mosque of Jesus son of Mary.AP



SYRACUSE, N.Y. – A city board on Thursday gave a Muslim group the go-ahead to remove six crosses from the roof and spires of a century-old former Catholic church so the now-vacant Gothic structure can be used as a mosque.

More than 200 people had signed an online petition calling on the Syracuse Landmark Preservation Board to deny an application by North Side Learning Center, the church's new owner, to remove the crosses and build a six-foot chain-link fence.

Before the vote to allow the church alterations, Chairman Don Radke said the board cannot interfere with a decision that involves religious freedom.

About a dozen people who spoke at the meeting were evenly divided for and against the church conversion, The Post-Standard reported.

Petition-signers, who included some local residents and former church parishioners, had argued that the former Holy Trinity Catholic Church was a neighborhood landmark built by German immigrants 100 years ago and removing the crosses would deface the architecture.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Syracuse closed the church in 2010 and merged the parish with that of St. John the Baptist because of a declining congregation as population shifted from the city to suburbs. The North Side Learning Center, a nonprofit group that provides literacy programs for immigrants, bought the church and its school and rectory for $150,000 in December.

Yusuf Soule, the center's director, has been the public point-person for the mosque effort. He said the crosses must be removed because the Islamic faith prohibits worship of idols and symbols.

A report by the nonprofit Onondaga Citizens League last summer said more than 7,200 refugees have resettled in the Syracuse area over the past 10 years, with the majority from Burma, Bhutan and Somalia.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/5/2014 12:23:01 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Dems’ Voter-Fraud Denial - How do you address a problem they insist doesn’t exist?

.............................................................................................
National Review Online ^ | APRIL 3, 2014 | John Fund




To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/5/2014 12:34:55 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Teach Common Sense not Common Core

.......................................................................................................
Canada Free Press ^ | 4/5/2014 | Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh




To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/5/2014 1:10:04 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
Common Core unable to count from 1 to 20

........................................................................................

How are parents supposed to help their children with Common Core math when it’s just flat-out wrong?

Parent Mina Boyd’s kindergartener was given an assignment to count the number of apples on the page and write the number. The worksheet is titled “Count and Write 20,” so presumably, there would be 20 apples to count.

Except there’s 19.

“They ask her to count and write 20. So she counts…counts again and again. And says mom, ‘there’s only 19,’” Boyd wrote on the Parents and Educators Against Common Core Standards Facebook page.


rightwingnews.com

credit fubho



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/7/2014 1:57:14 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Honey_Bee

  Respond to of 16547
 
TWO OF A KIND.............................................


.......................................



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/7/2014 1:58:12 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
The ties between President Obama and Al Sharpton are strong. The NY Daily News reports that Sharpton has visited the Oval Office several times during Obama’s tenure. In 2009, Sharpton and Michael Bloomberg met with Obama on education initiatives. In 2010, the president invited Sharpton back to discuss jobs and the state of the economy with other black leaders. Sharpton also took part in the First Lady’s 50th birthday celebration and supported the president’s young black and Hispanic men initiative.

This is the second time Obama has appeared at the NAN convention, also speaking at the event in 2011.



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/10/2014 5:06:25 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Ayaan Hirsi Ali Speaks
.....................................................................
Apr 9, 2014 • By WILLIAM KRISTOL
weeklystandard.com


Ayaan Hirsi Ali has just released this statement in response to Brandeis University's decision to rescind her invitation to receive an honorary degree:



“Yesterday Brandeis University decided to withdraw an honorary degree they were to confer upon me next month during their Commencement exercises. I wish to dissociate myself from the university’s statement, which implies that I was in any way consulted about this decision. On the contrary, I was completely shocked when President Frederick Lawrence called me—just a few hours before issuing a public statement—to say that such a decision had been made.

“When Brandeis approached me with the offer of an honorary degree, I accepted partly because of the institution’s distinguished history; it was founded in 1948, in the wake of World War II and the Holocaust, as a co-educational, nonsectarian university at a time when many American universities still imposed rigid admission quotas on Jewish students. I assumed that Brandeis intended to honor me for my work as a defender of the rights of women against abuses that are often religious in origin. For over a decade, I have spoken out against such practices as female genital mutilation, so-called 'honor killings,' and applications of Sharia Law that justify such forms of domestic abuse as wife beating or child beating. Part of my work has been to question the role of Islam in legitimizing such abhorrent practices. So I was not surprised when my usual critics, notably the Council of American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), protested against my being honored in this way.

A Note to Supporters of Brandeis

“What did surprise me was the behavior of Brandeis. Having spent many months planning for me to speak to its students at Commencement, the university yesterday announced that it could not “overlook certain of my past statements,” which it had not previously been aware of. Yet my critics have long specialized in selective quotation – lines from interviews taken out of context – designed to misrepresent me and my work. It is scarcely credible that Brandeis did not know this when they initially offered me the degree.

“What was initially intended as an honor has now devolved into a moment of shaming. Yet the slur on my reputation is not the worst aspect of this episode. More deplorable is that an institution set up on the basis of religious freedom should today so deeply betray its own founding principles.The 'spirit of free expression' referred to in the Brandeis statement has been stifled here, as my critics have achieved their objective of preventing me from addressing the graduating Class of 2014. Neither Brandeis nor my critics knew or even inquired as to what I might say. They simply wanted me to be silenced. I regret that very much.

“Not content with a public disavowal, Brandeis has invited me 'to join us on campus in the future to engage in a dialogue about these important issues.' Sadly, in words and deeds, the university has already spoken its piece. I have no wish to 'engage' in such one-sided dialogue. I can only wish the Class of 2014 the best of luck—and hope that they will go forth to be better advocates for free expression and free thought than their alma mater.

“I take this opportunity to thank all those who have supported me and my work on behalf of oppressed woman and girls everywhere.”



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/11/2014 1:48:30 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
Attkisson: When I'd Begin Investigating an Obama Scandal, CBS Would Pull Me Off...



To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/11/2014 6:24:10 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
HARRY REID'S SON REPRESENTING CHINESE SOLAR PANEL PLANT IN $5 BILLION NEVADA DEAL

Friday, April 11, 2014 5:09:28 PM · by Jim Robinson · 33 replies
Breitbart ^ | 9/14/2012 | By Wynton Hall





To: Honey_Bee who wrote (8916)4/12/2014 4:25:13 PM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
 
  • BREAKING: Emails Show Lois Lerner Fed True the Vote Tax Information to Democrat Elijah Cummings