Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (247773)	3/21/2014 9:56:24 PM
From: Sam	Respond to of 542043

Star Trek: The Next Generation Rewatch: “Home Soil” Keith DeCandido “Home Soil” Written by Karl Guers, Ralph Sanchez, and Robert Sabaroff Directed by Corey Allen Season 1, Episode 17 Production episode 40271-117 Original air date: February 22, 1988 Stardate: 41463.9 Captain’s Log: The Enterprise checks up on Velara III, a terraforming project that hasn’t been in touch much lately. When they arrive, Director Mandl is crotchety, cranky, and abrasive. Riker beams down over his objections, where they are given a tour by Luisa Kim, who is younger, prettier, dippier, and a lot more friendly. Kim’s enthusiasm is as infectious as Mandl’s snottiness is off-putting. Most of the first act is overrun by the Exposition Fairy, but it’s actually really cool stuff, as the team fill the crew in on how they’re turning a lifeless planet into one that can support living beings. However, the end of the act sees the hydraulics engineer performing maintenance on the laser drill only to be attacked by that drill and killed. When Data tries to reconstruct what happened, he is also attacked. Further investigation reveals a piece of inorganic material that glows in complex rhythms. La Forge sees almost musical patterns in it. They beam it back to the ship, where Crusher, Data, La Forge, and Wes start running tests. It responds to stimulus — humming at different levels depending on whether or not it’s being scanned, or how close people are standing to it. more at tor.com

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (247773)	3/22/2014 1:20:31 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542043

How Much Will A Pack Of Joints Cost? The Future Of Mass Market Marijuana fastcoexist.com As the weed business becomes legal in more and more states, don't be surprised to see big tobacco turn into big marijuana. But how much will they charge you? Since the legalization of marijuana in Colorado and Washington, several articles have circulated suggesting that Marlboro would soon be getting in on the weed selling business. This was all started, it appears by an article in Abril Uno (April 1st in Spanish), a satire publication. These claims--unsurpisingly, given the source--seem to be false. But it does makes one wonder: What would a pack of Marlboro Mary Janes cost? I spoke with Jeff Caldwell, a representative of Altria, the parent company of Philip Morris, which makes Marlboro Cigarettes, and he stated that because the selling of marijuana is illegal at the federal level, their “companies have no plans to sell marijuana-based products.” He also didn’t seem too keen on speculating on such possibilities. At the low end of things, you’re looking at a production cost of nearly $40 per pack of Mary Janes.But Marlboro is in the business of making money, so it seems likely they would want to get in on such a large market. According to a 2010 paper, t he business could yield more than $20 billion a year in just tax revenues. Imagine what it could yield for a company mass marketing joints. In June of 2013, a company named BOTEC speculated that the production cost of marijuana ranges from $2 to $3 per gram, which “implies a price to retailers of $6.25, which is broadly consistent with current access points paying about $5 per gram.” The average Marlboro cigarette has just under one gram of tobacco in each of the 20 cigarettes contained in a pack. So at the low end of things, you’re looking at a production cost of nearly $40 per pack of Mary Janes. In the current weed economy, successful companies like Medicine Man in Denver are selling 20 pre-rolled, one-gram joints for $120. Medicine Man produces high-quality products, though, and the company is not anywhere close to the size of Marlboro. But production cost also does not factor in what the company must charge to make a profit. The Economics of Smoking, written in 1992, declared that production costs are often half of what cigarette companies wholesale their product for, so what costs a large corporation $40 per pack could result in a $70 or $80 retail price. You also might not need a whole gram of marijuana in every cigarette.The cost of a pack could be brought down by the massive economies of scale a company like Marlboro would bring to the market. You also might not need a whole gram of marijuana in every cigarette--a little can go a lot farther than a gram of tobacco. Another solution: mix the marijuana with tobacco. If marijuana cigarettes were to be mixed with tobacco, at a 50-50 ratio, it would bring the cost down significantly. Many tobacco farmers will wholesale a pound of their product for less than $2. With a 50-50 ratio of marijuana to tobacco, the cost of producing a pack of 20 pre-rolled joints could be brought down to just a little more than $20--so a $40 pack at the store. It isn’t as easy as it seems, though. The government has a vested interest in producing income from the selling of marijuana. In Colorado, the law that voted in marijuana brought with it a 25% tax. The tax includes 15% excise and 10% sales tax. Marlboro Cigarette companies are very familiar with the excise tax. Philip Morris’s website explicitly states their opposition to the current excise tax--taxes on products that aren't good for society--writing: “Between 2000 and 2012, federal and state cigarette excise tax rates were raised more than 120 times, more than doubling the price of a pack of cigarettes.” According to Philip Morris, the price of a pack of cigarettes is merely $2.60 after production cost and company revenue, before the 55% of the price that goes to the government. Cigarette taxes are often increased locally to deter smoking, but smoking kills in ways that marijuana doesn't. The tax would likely be closer to 50% if the marijuana was mixed with tobacco, or closer to the 25% we see today in Colorado if the product was solely marijuana. The bottom line is a pack of purely marijuana cigarettes is going to run you at least $50, and a pack of marijuana-tobacco mixed cigarettes could be as affordable as $20. The mixed cigarettes would cost less to produce, but since they include tobacco, the states would likely tax them around twice as much as if they didn’t. Read about Creative Edge Nutrition, a growing company that can generate 1.3 million pounds of weed a year. We don’t know the price of a pack of “Marlboro Ms” to the cent, but it seems they would be around 10 times as expensive as normal cigarettes. With Altria’s recent acquisition of Green Smoke, an e-cigarette company, they may just be finding a way to circumvent the legal issues. E-cigarettes, like those made by Green Smoke, are now regularly used as a way to consume marijuana, and it frees up Altria from having to get involved with the growing or selling of semi-illicit products itself. They may not be ready to open the gates to the farms yet, but they seem to be keeping their eye on the industry. It may be some time before you’re smoking a mass-produced marijuana cigarette, but it won’t be long before you could be smoking marijuana out of something produced by Marlboro.