Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tickertype who wrote (1707)	12/12/1997 1:13:00 AM
From: Gordon Quickstad	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

<<...yesterday found out that his statements were disbelieved, and he is quite indignant about it>> So this anonymous internet user is putting everyone on notice that every word from his keyboard is to be taken as inerrant truth from now or else you risk his wrath? I suggest that he lighten up on the God complex. Overall, I've lost money in VLNC as many others have here, and I'm truly sorry for our losses. I got out of the stock about the time of the ULBI "burnt hole" news with a loss because the press comments were dissing the LPB technology in general and the industry needed to address the negativity. As the stock began to slip, I've endevoured to balance the euphoria that's been exhibited here about production with balance consisting of published commentary that I've dug up. News usually follows price and already now we're starting to see 2nd quarter production speculation instead of 1st quarter. The post from AOL just didn't ring right for me for reasons I mentioned. One thing needed here is caution and enough skepticism to not let hypesters gain too much influence, to keep as accurate a view of VLNC as possible. It seems to me that the AOL posters would share how they were able to get through to Mr. Reed when others aren't. Also, they contradict Jordan, the IR person, about giving out insider information unevenly to investors.

To: Tickertype who wrote (1707)	12/12/1997 2:41:00 AM
From: Robert Cohen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27311

Just one question. Why would CR speak to several anonymous shareholders but is unwilling to make a public statement. Send me CR's email address. I will most certainly post his response here. My email address is rcohen@sonic.net. Please note that in my profile I use my real name. BTW if you truly had inside information would you share it with the world or keep it to yourself. OTOH if your trying to hype the stock...oh you know what I mean. As far as the updates from others I suggest that you review the thread from the beginning to check the accuracy of the "insiders". Robert