SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (51515)4/1/2014 10:12:37 PM
From: Solon  Respond to of 69300
 
"The Genetic Code Is One in a Million"

What isn't!!

Your existence is almost an infinite improbability! But you are here. And a gazillion other lives (followed by a page of ha ha's) are not here. Do you think somebody who looks and acts like you was "designed!" OH MY GOD! YIKES!! Somebody bribed the Prof!

While an infinite number of Solons and Einsteins and Emersons and Aescylus's were crucified in the crucible of advanced (but perfect)! Design learning?!

And one rare person claims you are not a dullard?? HELLO?

"The Genetic Code Is One in a Million"

WOW! So all you need is a million possibilities to have a Certainty. About the same chance as you getting laid... ;-)



To: Brumar89 who wrote (51515)4/2/2014 5:35:37 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
DNA is not a code, its only analogous to a code in enough ways that makes sense for us to refer to things like the “genetic code,” but in the end, we’re just not talking about the kind of code that would make the theist argument valid. So sorry bumdum, you fail on this one, too.

Keep trying though, you have all eternity with that rich family money to drone on, cutting & pasting these dated creationists arguments indefinitely. You'd have alot more grasp of reality if you had ever created & run an enterprise yourself, not just subscribe to a Reader's Digest of the universe for morons.

Imagine if you had to actually work for a living, what knowledge you'd have instead of everything coming from sitting in that chair reproducing blindly & dumbly the same cut n pastes everyday for years?

(



To: Brumar89 who wrote (51515)4/2/2014 3:22:06 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
These results are based on the assumption that all forms of error at all bases are equally likely.

This is a bad assumption since the selection events ensure that errors which create a problem are absent or underrepresented in the next generation. They are only looking at DNA that actually successfully reproduce.