Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (166639)	4/2/2014 10:02:19 AM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Recommended By TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224729

There is some good analysis in this write up, and the author noticed two tells of lying by Obama. Everybody on FOX noticed that Sebelius was hidden and not even publicly thanked or acknowledged by Obama. No other station mentioned her. She is the scapegoat when the true numbers come out, and the press won't be able to sugar coat them. Once the true numbers for Obamacare are uncovered, she will be blamed. Consider new data from the RAND Corporation, still unpublished, but shared with the L os Angeles Times (which used them in flattering piece on Obamacare) and teased out by the UK Daily ..just 23 per cent of new enrollees had no insurance before signing up. And of those newly insured Americans, just 53 per cent have paid their first month's premiums. If those numbers hold, the actual net gain of paid policies among Americans who lacked medical insurance in the pre-Obamacare days would be just 858,298. That would amount to roughly 2% of the 46 million uninsured claimed by President Obama to be the compelling reason for Obamacare’s disruption of the health insurance system in the United States. americanthinker.com