Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (778085)	4/2/2014 6:04:23 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	1 Recommendation Recommended By bentway Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573958

One must not jump to the conclusion that they exist. However, that possibility is also not excluded Fact.....they may not exist nor ever existed and have never been found......the reference is to chemical agents, not hardware..... The ruins of hardware do not disappear, chemical agents do and can disappear and most likely never existed at all.... Even if they did they were not justification for a full scale invasion of a nation that made no threat or was a threat to us... The Blix inspections were very careful and mostly consisted of sites supplied by the US.... And never forget the constant interchanging of the names Saddam, Al Quaeda, and bin Laden..... At one point Bush had 70% if the nation convinced that Saddam was at least partially responsible for 9-11. He made daily speeches that included the references...