Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (7133)	12/12/1997 9:43:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

Thanks Jerard, I never thought I 'got' HL just providing my little piece of the puzzle. Clearly you have better info on the subject than I do. I was never certain that HL was behind the "Gabenson" e-mails but it is interesting that they have stopped. BTW I still think the thread is very useful, perhaps more useful than before. The arguement between various viewpoints has been quite instructive and I have learned a LOT more about Naxos and more certain of our position than ever. I have found the objections of people like Michael Grasso and knight thought provoking and valuable to me personally in my efforts to analyze this investment. As we continue the discussion I wouldn't at all be surprised if one or both became shareholders. I also welcome the IPM shareholders who bring interesting insights to the debate. I know the hurly burly of the debate and arguement on the thread can be annoying and at times obnoxious. But pressure builds strength and I am more convinced about Naxos because of what has come out on the thread oveer the recent weeks. Henry ps I've always enjoyed your contribution. This post is meant entirely as an exchange of views between friends (just wanted to say that in case I was coming off preachy)