SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : QUANTUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John A. Shaffer who wrote (6623)12/12/1997 10:00:00 AM
From: Rational  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9124
 
John:

I want to know where she got the info that the PC server market was slowing and that tape demand was slowing. Did she really listen to the CC? This was publicly available by independent research groups. She extrapolated to DLT.

I swear all the analysts are a bunch of idiots. This is generally true.

No analyst is now talking about macro-finance changes that have ensued the failure of the Asian banking system, e.g., high cost of capital and credit crunch that Asian countries will experience. The cost of labor for DD manufacturing will be almost the same for the US and Asian DD makers since all DD makers have plants in Asia.

Asian DD makers will have to raise the price of HDs, however, to break-even due to a very high cost of capital. This would mean that the dumping (if they want to continue) will have to be at higher prices or Asian DD makers will quit business. This bodes well for US DD makers that no analyst has yet fugured out or, if they have, they will not say so until their clients accumulate shares.

Sankar



To: John A. Shaffer who wrote (6623)12/12/1997 10:11:00 AM
From: still learning  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9124
 
Rather than fightingthe analysts and the tape, whatsay we look at their revised #s and see where we think the stock is going.

"We are decreasing fiscal 1998 estimates from $2.26 to 1.81, reducing our fiscal 1999
estimates from $3.45 to $2.50, and reducing our rating on the shares to a 3-Neutral"

If we see $1.81 this year (ALL: THIS DOES INLCUDE SPLITS!!!)
and $2.50 next year.

And we apply a multiple of 12x *as of March or mid-April (after Q4)*, we get a $30 price once we are safely into next FY. So we should get a price moving from $20 toward $30 this Spring. I think that'sthe short-term reality unless and until we get earnings revisions upward.

Given this hypothetical, what does everyone plan to do?

I will possibly sell a portion at $25, another at $30 to lock in some of my gains once we start going up (yes, I bought at an average of $17 and let this market steal most of it back). Given that I have a large position, I plan to hold 2./3 of it for long-term (3-5 years) but this time I may be prepared to take some money off the table.

Other opinions?



To: John A. Shaffer who wrote (6623)12/12/1997 5:39:00 PM
From: Jeff Egg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9124
 
John I must agree. I now view Lehman as the absolute reverse market indicator as it relates to this company. I raise my expectation from very cautious to an aggressive buy. I think she was more concerned about her estimation of the worth of DLT alone only days before. She gives me comfort in the stock I was able to add to my position sub 19. Jeff Egg