SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (778576)4/6/2014 6:59:26 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573902
 
Hi combjelly; Re: "You've got to be kidding. So you are a Permian-Triassic Extinction denier?";

I'm denying that the extinction was necessarily caused by methane hydrates, LOL.

The search you provided did not include methane hydrates in any of the links I clicked. Let's see what wikipedia says about the extinction:

Researchers have variously suggested that there were from one to three distinct pulses, or phases, of extinction. [6] [10] [11] [12] There are several proposed mechanisms for the extinctions; the earlier phase was probably due to gradual environmental change, while the latter phase has been argued to be due to a catastrophic event. Suggested mechanisms for the latter include large or multiple bolide impact events, increased volcanism, coal/gas fires and explosions from the Siberian Traps, [13] and sudden release of methane clathrate from the sea floor; a runaway greenhouse effect triggered by methane-producing microbes, [14] gradual changes include sea-level change, anoxia, increasing aridity, and a shift in ocean circulation driven by climate change.

...

However, the pattern of isotope shifts expected to result from a massive release of methane does not match the patterns seen throughout the early Triassic. Not only would a methane cause require the release of five times as much methane as postulated for the PETM, [15] but it would also have to be reburied at an unrealistically high rate to account for the rapid increases in the 13C/12C ratio (episodes of high positive d13C) throughout the early Triassic, before being released again several times. [15]

en.wikipedia.org

So it's another case of you can believe it or not. Science just doesn't know. Read the literature. You'll find it's quite complicated. No one knows.

-- Carl