SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John F. Dowd who wrote (14857)12/12/1997 10:39:00 AM
From: Chi-X  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
CNBC Interview with NSCP CEO Jim Barksdale:

<CNBC_Live> tyler: With the latest ruling against microsoft,
<CNBC_Live> rivals are cheering. Joining us now with the
<CNBC_Live> latest is bruce francis with "tech '97."
<CNBC_Live> hello, bruce. Bruce: Good morning everybody.
<CNBC_Live> >>> as we have been reporting this morning, a
<CNBC_Live> federal judge has enjoined microsoft from licensing
<CNBC_Live> windows 95 along with its browser, internet explorer.
<CNBC_Live> the case is far from over, but it's the biggest blow
<CNBC_Live> yet to microsoft's strategy of combining the two
<CNBC_Live> products, as they have said they want to do in windows
<CNBC_Live> 98. The most direct
<CNBC_Live> beneficiary, archrival netscape.
<CNBC_Live> ceo jim barksdale joins us now from mountain view,
<CNBC_Live> california. Good morning, thank for being
<CNBC_Live> with us. >> good morning, bruce.
<CNBC_Live> bruce: This is a good news for netscape?
<CNBC_Live> apparently shareholders think so.
<CNBC_Live> they're bidding you up 2 1/4 right now.
<CNBC_Live> >> sure it's good news for us, it's good news for our
<CNBC_Live> customers and consumers. Bruce: How do you expect this
<CNBC_Live> to effect immediately the way you do business?
<CNBC_Live> >> well, within the next three to six months, many of the pc
<CNBC_Live> manufacturers are going to be rebidding their desktop
<CNBC_Live> software and so we think it gives us a great shot at that
<CNBC_Live> business. That we have been pretty much
<CNBC_Live> precluded from up to now because of the microsoft
<CNBC_Live> practices. Bruce: Give me your best
<CNBC_Live> guess. It seems to me very, very
<CNBC_Live> common for a lot of pc to have both browsers on them.
<CNBC_Live> do you have any sense of how many new pc that are shipped
<CNBC_Live> actually do have both? >> I don't know, bruce, i
<CNBC_Live> haven't seen those numbers. But I think you're right.
<CNBC_Live> many, many are shipped with both products on them.
<CNBC_Live> bruce: The current market share figures, it's hard to
<CNBC_Live> figure out just what is the correct number.
<CNBC_Live> are you comfortable with 60% for you?
<CNBC_Live> that's been on the low end of what i've seen?
<CNBC_Live> do you feel that's your good for your market share right
<CNBC_Live> now? >> our market share reported
<CNBC_Live> last week was 67%, bruce, two-thirds of the people
<CNBC_Live> prefer our product, even against these sort of anti-
<CNBC_Live> competitive practices of microsoft so we feel real good
<CNBC_Live> about that. Bruce: If microsoft does
<CNBC_Live> prevail here and gets to go ahead with windows 98 and the
<CNBC_Live> integration of both the browser with the operating
<CNBC_Live> system, does that just ruin your chances of getting ahead
<CNBC_Live> in the browser wars? >> no, no, only 18% of our
<CNBC_Live> revenue last quarter, bruce, came from stand alone browser
<CNBC_Live> sales. Netscape is much more selling
<CNBC_Live> its products to businesses for intrabusiness communications
<CNBC_Live> and electronic commerce outside their businesses.
<CNBC_Live> bruce: Why do we care about browsers?
<CNBC_Live> why does netscape care about browsers if most of your money
<CNBC_Live> and especially even more in the long-term is going to come
<CNBC_Live> from the sale of server software, advertising, things
<CNBC_Live> like that? Why do you care about having
<CNBC_Live> control of the client? >> I don't know that I care to
<CNBC_Live> have control. I just care to have an even
<CNBC_Live> shot. What I care about is consumers
<CNBC_Live> having choice, customers having choice, and i'm
<CNBC_Live> appalled that the current practices preclude them from
<CNBC_Live> that. Bruce: Do you -- but is there
<CNBC_Live> a correlation between having strong browser market share
<CNBC_Live> and good share in the server software? And things that actually make
<CNBC_Live> you money? >> most of our sales, bruce,
<CNBC_Live> are system sales where they buy clients and servers
<CNBC_Live> together regardless of what the exterior market share
<CNBC_Live> would be, but certainly, market share of browsers does
<CNBC_Live> have a lot to do with what developers develop for so that
<CNBC_Live> they can get to their customers.
<CNBC_Live> therefore, it's important that there be a competitive
<CNBC_Live> landscape for these products. Bruce: As the market share
<CNBC_Live> numbers have shifted in browsers, what have you
<CNBC_Live> noticed about the developer response?
<CNBC_Live> has microsoft gets more desktops, has it also gotten
<CNBC_Live> more support from those developers that you as you say,
<CNBC_Live> need their, that strong support?
<CNBC_Live> >> developers want to go where the market is, certainly
<CNBC_Live> two-thirds share for netscape would mean no developers going
<CNBC_Live> to avoid using our product in the development of their
<CNBC_Live> products if they want to get to the market.
<CNBC_Live> so we haven't seen any real change in that.
<CNBC_Live> we have we think about 28,000 developers who develop for our
<CNBC_Live> platform and it's been that number, that number has grown
<CNBC_Live> it seems to me by 5, 6,000 in the last six to nine months.
<CNBC_Live> bruce: Do you think netscape has suffered financial harm
<CNBC_Live> because of what you term as anti-competitive practices so
<CNBC_Live> far, actual financial harm? >> oh, sure it has.
<CNBC_Live> bruce: Would you intend to, if eventually the judge agrees
<CNBC_Live> fully with microsoft, do you intend to seek reparations for
<CNBC_Live> that? Is there legal recourse for
<CNBC_Live> you? >> we'll cross that bridge.
<CNBC_Live> i can't imagine the judge agreeing completely given what
<CNBC_Live> he said yesterday. I can't imagine him agreeing
<CNBC_Live> completely but if he does, certainly we will take that
<CNBC_Live> into consideration. But I don't mean to imply that
<CNBC_Live> it's kept netscape from being the fastest growing software
<CNBC_Live> company in history. But certainly, maybe we could
<CNBC_Live> have grown even a little faster.
<CNBC_Live> we just think it's a major issue of giving customers
<CNBC_Live> choice just like you want choice in your tv programming.
<CNBC_Live> bruce: If microsoft eventually has to put out two versions,
<CNBC_Live> one version of win 9x with the integrated browser and
<CNBC_Live> operating system and one without, is that acceptable to
<CNBC_Live> netscape? >> I would want to see that
<CNBC_Live> proposal at that time. I don't know if that would be
<CNBC_Live> acceptable at all, no. Bruce: All right.
<CNBC_Live> mr. Barksdale, when we get more information, I hope
<CNBC_Live> you'll come on and keep us informed.
<CNBC_Live> >> thank you very much. >>> jim barksdale netscape
<CNBC_Live> ceo, thanks for joining us. We'll keep you plugged in.



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (14857)12/12/1997 11:26:00 AM
From: Reginald Middleton  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
You are mistaken in your statement "So all the erudition in your wonderful evaluation gets tossed out the window by the invisible hand of irrational perception... Because they all don't invest the way you do." The vast majority of Wall Street invests like I do. Sharp price changes that occur on day to day basis are not the manifestations of the large buy side investors. Those are the results of traders and the clients of sell side insitutions, neither of which have the resources nor the time to do aggressive investigation and analysis of companies on an individual basis. traders benefit from volatility, thus tend to casue it, sell side institutions benefit from brokerage commissions gained from those that trade often, therefore tend to encourage trading. LArge buyside institutions (institutional investors such Buffet, Fidelity, Pension funds, etc.) benefit from neither, therefore tend not to participate in giving their profits away as transaction fees and oppurtunity losses. Do not confuse the day to day fluctuations with the action of true investors. It is the true investors who wield the bulk of the capital in the US markets. So do not be overly concerned with a 3.5% drop in MSFT share price. It is not the wielders of superior information causing, or at least not yet.

I haven't had much time to post on SI lately, but I am in the process of investigating NXTL (at least soon).



To: John F. Dowd who wrote (14857)12/12/1997 1:07:00 PM
From: John Donahoe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24154
 
RE: "As I understand the ruling it was that MSFT could not require the box makers to buy the browser. Now all of a sudden people are assuming that this means that MSFT will not be allowed to imbed the browser as a function of the new OS."

That's my understanding also.

Is there anything, legal/technical preventing MSFT from selling two versions of WIN98. A stripped down version and a fully integrated version.

CNBC Bruce Francis just announced that MSFT stated that the ruling will not cause them to delay the release of WIN98 @10:00 PST.

JD