SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (779055)4/8/2014 2:13:08 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574056
 
<<
>> When 97% of the top scientist's say something is real only a fool would argue with them.

So, when Ptolemy convinced 97% of the world's scientists that the Earth was the center of the Universe -- a belief that held for nearly 1400 years until a mere 500 years ago -- were the disbelievers "fools"?>>

The church did not allow scientist's to tell the truth for hundreds of years. When the scientist's finally got to tell the truth civilization prospered.

<<You should begin your response with "Yes" or "No", followed by "because" then explain your reasoning.>>

You can't do that! You end up with this problem:

I ask you this question and answer yes or no and then explain your reasoning.

Have you stopped besting your wife? yes or no




To: i-node who wrote (779055)4/8/2014 2:36:35 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1574056
 
"So, when Ptolemy convinced 97% of the world's scientists that the Earth was the center of the Universe -- a belief that held for nearly 1400 years until a mere 500 years ago -- were the disbelievers "fools"?"

Dave, good science overcame that belief. Because science is a progression towards the truth. Religion and superstition, no.

Here's science overcoming a long-held belief:

Stradivarius No Match for New Violins, Test Finds
SOLOISTS ASSESS RENOWNED INSTRUMENTS WITH SURPRISING RESULTS

By Matt Cantor, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted Apr 8, 2014 11:08 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – Musicians have long been captivated by the instruments of the Stradivari family; centuries after they were built, they've become the stuff of legend. Yet new blind tests seem to shatter the notion that a Stradivarius is actually superior to today's violins. In fact, the tests found expert violinists prefer the new models, and couldn't even distinguish which were new and which were old, LiveScience reports. "Like most people in the violin world, I grew up absolutely believing there was a difference between an old sound and a new sound, and most violinists could readily distinguish it," says violin maker and researcher Joseph Curtin. That is, "until I ... was really forced to listen with my ears, rather than my preconceptions."

His team had 10 famous soloists don sight-obliterating welder's glasses and play six old and six new violins in two environments: a practice studio and a concert hall. The worn edges and antique style of the new ones obscured their youth. The violinists (who, for music buffs, included Olivier Charlier, Pierre Fouchenneret, Susanne Hou, Ilya Kaler, and Giora Schmidt, the Telegraph notes.) rated the instruments in a number of categories, including tone, playability, and volume. The best-performing instrument, according to the soloists as a group, was a new one—it was the favorite of four testers and the second-favorite of four others. The runner-up was a new violin, too, while the third-place finisher was a Stradivarius; the makers of the new ones weren't revealed. As for whether the violinists could discern between new and old, LiveScience notes they were "no more accurate than the flip of a coin." Think you could do better? Take a listening test here.