SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yousef who wrote (26671)12/12/1997 12:27:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 1585071
 
Yousef,
Thanks. I guess one of my questions could be rephrased as...does the design of the K6 have anything to do with the yield problems vs the design of the Pentium? If so AMD may never be able to get the same yields as Intel. Of course, as little as I know about yields this could be a dumb question.
If IBM is making K6's this would explain the seemingly good supply of them in retail boxes. IBM would be at least supplying themselves and ACER. The Aptiva boxes do say IBM K6. If true, IBM with better yields has literally stolen the K6. It also might explain why IBM is using K6's instead of 6x86s in it's new Aptivas. The K6 is simply cheaper to make.
AMD is clearly going for market share and hoping for some profitability way down the road. A noble effort but not too good for the stockholders in the forseeable future.
Jim