Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ellen who wrote (26612)	12/12/1997 11:37:00 AM
From: Pugs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Ellen, Paul considers himself a 'shortbuster' but CAN'T SEE A FRICKEN SQUEEZE STARIN' AT HIM RIGHT IN THE FACE!!!!! Don't waste your time! ______________________________________________________________ FYI.>>>>> Reminiscing about the Iomega squeeze, (take a look at the chart) there was a long wait. Sad but true. There were false starts, enthusiasm about runups, and disappointments about downturns. Some news would come out and there'd be a buying spree for a day or two, then some apathy and negativity would settle the price and people would be gloomy. I know a lot of folks got fed up and moved on. Others bought more. Everyone does what they think is best. But, in time, the wall was broken and a stock that cost a buck or two went on up to a pre split value of a couple hundred bucks a share. Nobody can know when it will happen, it is a process not an event. All the things happening on RMIL are part of that process. Even the bad stuff. Sure, you kick yourself in the butt when you buy a little higher yesterday than you could today. Sure you get frustrated about the paper loss, but that's all part of the squeeze process too. Other people in other sqeezes have felt the exact same way. Some son't have the stomach for it. Some do.<<<<<<, Pugs

To: Ellen who wrote (26612)	12/12/1997 1:24:00 PM
From: Emec	Respond to of 55532

Ellen, I believe Paul's point was that restricted shares are still outstanding shares??

To: Ellen who wrote (26612)	12/12/1997 1:34:00 PM
From: PC11	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Ellen and Pugs: Ellen: My post should have been directed at Steve Johnson. His "price-per-share" analysis was majorly flawed to say the least. The fact that you "supported" his assertion that restricted shares should not be included in this analysis only supports my accusation. Yes I did accuse you of posting something false. Don't blame the messenger. I did the same thing to Pugs when he attempted to explain a $6 value per share of OLPG/OVIS/RMIL by taking the $10 million funding and dividing it by the float????? Once again I have no problem with the discussion of a squeeze possibility and would never attempt to dissuade discussion of such. But when it comes to financial analysis of OLPG/OVIS/RMIL, I WILL NOT condone the posting of grossly misleading financial analysis. Pugs: You should know by now that I do not care whether the yeas or neas win this battle. However, I will not allow misleading financial information about OLPG/OVIS/RMIL to be posted on this thread. You should know that by now! Once again best of luck.