Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : American Presidential Politics and foreign affairs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greatplains_guy who wrote (70020)	4/15/2014 2:49:23 PM
From: sandintoes	Respond to of 71588

There's a lesson here, but first there's another example to be found in this week's Equal Pay Day celebration in Washington. Washington Examiner readers have known for years not to trust the assertion that women earn only 77 cents on a man's dollar - a statistic that ignores both hours worked and type of job. Unfortunately for President Obama, this was the year the rest of the media figured it out too. Mainstream outlets finally discerned that using Obama's own crude and deliberately misleading calculation, his White House is a terrible underpayer of women. Some of his Senate Democrat allies - self-styled solvers of gender pay inequality - are even worse, paying them (again, by their own flawed method of calculation) as little as 71 cents on a man's dollar. ROFLOL!!!