Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: koan who wrote (780062)	4/15/2014 7:27:42 PM
From: Brumar89	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1578106

Emasculated boys a myth? Exhibit: PajamaBoy Ethan Krupp, aka pajamaboy, really DOES in fact live with his parents in the North Shore section of Chicago. A U-Wisconsin communciations graduate, he "works" for OFA. Pajamaboy defines himself: "Liberal Fck"* Pajama boy snapped the ultimate selfieEthel C. Fenig Arrogant. Rude. Smug. Wealthy. Isolated from reality. Bigot. Narrow minded. And oh, this content writer/pajama boy icon for President Barack Obama's deceptive Organizing For America, is dangerous. Yep, your first impression upon gazing at pajama boy's smirking face was correct according to this portrait by Patrick Howley in the Daily Caller. Proudly calling himself a "liberal f*k," pajama boy model and auteur, Ethan Krupp, described himself in his blog, which for, hmmm, some reason he deleted "I am a Liberal Fuck," Krupp wrote in one post. "A Liberal Fuck is not a Democrat, but rather someone who combines political data and theory, extreme leftist views and sarcasm* to win any argument while make the opponents feel terrible about themselves. I won every argument but one." That one losing argument (he's probably lost others, such as pajama boy, but doesn't know it) was to a "conservative gay prick" about abortion "because it would be the ultimate surrender if I knew the truth." This kind thinks saying something nasty to someone is 'winning an argument.' Facts do get in the way of leftist grand theory so chuck them if necessary. And, as a lefty, of course he is unashamedly bigoted. As The Daily Caller reported, Krupp was accused of racism and anti-Semitism during his college-aged stint as the editor of the Madison, Wisconsin comedy newspaper the "Madison Misnomer." Krupp blithely agrees. To them I give a huge middle finger, and then probably agree with their concerns," Krupp said. (snip) "We have no morals, and we will attack you. But you really don't have to worry because no one reads the paper anyway," Krupp added. As I said, dangerous. He has publicly laid out his plans, smoothly soothes by advising to ignore him but admits to no morals to winning and achieving his goals. Straight from Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, the Obama bible. You have been warned. Red and black onesies or not, this manchild is dangerous. Rosslyn Smith adds: I am also not surprised to learn he was raised in the north lakefront suburbs of Chicago and attended New Trier Township High.New Trier kids have the reputation for being rich spoiled brats. Over the years the schooll has served as the exterior location of movies like Ferris Bueller's Day Off and Sixteen Candles while The Breakfast Club's title comes from the nickname invented by New Trier students and staff for morning detention. A great many children at New Trier acquire some skewed outlooks on the world thanks to a combination of helicoptering parents who indulge their every whim and teachers who spout the latest trendy ideas. I've seen parents spend enough money on a 16 year old's hobby to support a large working class family for a year.Knowing he was from New Trier I suspect only organic sustainable cocoa beans go into pajamaboy's hot chocolate. BTW pajamaboy aka Krupp, actually still lives with his parents, after graduating from U or Wisconsin with an obviously worthless degree in communications. Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2013/12/pajama_boy_snapped_the_ultimate_selfie.html#ixzz2omEVfS8C Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter \| AmericanThinker on Facebook

To: koan who wrote (780062)	4/16/2014 2:17:00 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578106

>>> Where do you see that? I don't want to words in your mouth so tell me why you think that is so. <<< Any person should feel right and good about who and what they are as an individual. We all work every day to find ways to grow and become the best person we can be, at least that is the healthy way to approach this life experience and it should be respected. A man by nature is a masculine being. This is what defines manhood in the logical sense. This is right and good for a man. Anything that is done to deprive a man of his natural role or identity is emasculating. What does that mean? It means confidence in self, courage to do what is right or necessary, Responsibility, take charge of their own life, treat others with respect and dignity, kind, gentle, considerate, a protector and provider for those in their sphere of influence. Emasculated men have suppressed these qualities in themselves. Emasculation is loss of masculinity and personal power. The claim some people like to make is that emasculation of manhood is caused by women but that isn’t true. It is only possible for a man to do that to himself. So in answer to your question, this is where I see that. · Direct or indirect messages conveying a meaning that being a man doesn’t mean something good or that being a man is something to be deplored. · Belittling what you are trying to do or what men in general do for a living or as a main interest. · Making productive endeavors an issue, not good enough, or not earning enough. · Circumventing manly efforts to accomplish something by taking that control away. · Public displays of anger. It is unmanly to respond to an angry person and especially an angry woman in any manner. · Males in nature are independent whereas women are likely to band together. Micromanaging a man makes him feel like a slave. · Verbal abuse in the form of expressing displeasure about short comings.