SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harry Landsiedel who wrote (11097)12/12/1997 2:10:00 PM
From: Robert Voigt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Re: Split. I believe the 12/31 date is the "record" date for administrative purposes. Maybe others can be more enlighening.

Yes, it is. In today's environment when most stock is held in a street name, it becomes nothing more than a formality. If you buy before the split occurs, but after the record date you get a "right to ownership" (or something like this). It means that whoever sold (after the record date) will have to give up their post split shares. This is all handled automatically by the brokerage houses.

The only possible stickler, would be if you had actual certificates. You would still get new ones, but someone else, may have to send theirs back. This is rare. The date is primarily administrative.



To: Harry Landsiedel who wrote (11097)12/13/1997 2:51:00 PM
From: KiddStock  Respond to of 97611
 
You are correct sir!!! Both Reuters and S&P report the stock holders as of 12/31/97 will recieve the stock dividend in form of 1:1 stock split. This is payable on Jan. 20, 1998 and will trade on a post-split basis beginning Jan. 21, 1998. If you buy the stock after close of business 1/20/98 you are not entitled to the dividend, it goes "ex-dividend" at that time (meaning it trades without the dividend after that date.