Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bread Upon The Water who wrote (249299)	4/18/2014 2:34:41 PM
From: koan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542229

Here is the deal about the WSJ. There are are many, many, more and better things to read out there that provide the information one expects to get in the WSJ, so why would one waste their time on that one? Additionally, when you read the WSJ, you have to read every single story with skepticism as Murdock made his fortune selling lies, so one never knows when he will interject lies as that is the foundation of his empire. I would rather read something that generally tells the truth. It is like the study that showed FOX last year only got 7% of their climate stories correct, but MSNBC got 93% of theirs correct. Crazy to watch FOX. But we all know that. But, IMO, Crazy to read the WSJ as well. Two peas in a pod.