SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : How Quickly Can Obama Totally Destroy the US? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/22/2014 2:34:58 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
 
'Negroes in the house! Negroes in the house!' Oprah shouted as her father and his wife
..................................................................
UK Daily Mail ^ | April 22, 2014 | Laura Collins


Barbara Winfrey can pinpoint exactly when her divorce turned more ugly than she had ever thought possible. It was Friday 2 November 2012, her sixty-fourth birthday, and the day she received the telephone call that turned the implosion of her marriage into an 18-month legal battle with one of the most powerful celebrities on the planet – her stepdaughter, Oprah Winfrey. Barbara listened as Oprah delivered her thunderous ultimatum: ‘You say I never talk to you? I want to talk to you now. You have until Monday to get out of MY house.’ Earlier this month Barbara was finally served with an eviction notice. She has until 29 May to vacate the $1.4million house just south of Nashville that was home throughout her 14-year union to Oprah’s father, Vernon Winfrey.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
'Negroes in the house! Negroes in the house!' Oprah shouted as her father and his wife arrived. 'She was reminding us of our low class,' says Oprah's bitter stepmother in an explosive first-ever interview
  • After 14 years of marriage to Oprah's father Vernon, Barbara Winfrey is being forced out of her marital home by Oprah, leaving her homeless


  • By Laura Collins In Nashville, Tennessee

    22 April 2014



    This is the first of a two-part world exclusive interview with Barbara Winfrey, the ex-wife of Oprah's father Vernon. In Part 2, to be published tomorrow, Mrs. Winfrey will reveal the shocking details of the big blowup between Oprah and her boyfriend Stedman Graham, the truth about her relationship with Gayle King and how she really feels about being in her own skin.

    Barbara Winfrey can pinpoint exactly when her divorce turned more ugly than she had ever thought possible.

    It was Friday 2 November 2012, her sixty-fourth birthday, and the day she received the telephone call that turned the implosion of her marriage into an 18-month legal battle with one of the most powerful celebrities on the planet – her stepdaughter, Oprah Winfrey.

    Barbara listened as Oprah delivered her thunderous ultimatum: ‘You say I never talk to you?
    I want to talk to you now. You have until Monday to get out of MY house.’

    Earlier this month Barbara was finally served with an eviction notice. She has until 29 May to vacate the $1.4million house just south of Nashville that was home throughout her 14-year union to Oprah’s father, Vernon Winfrey.





    +13

    Member of the wedding: Oprah didn't exactly embrace Barbara Winfrey when she became part of the family. But she certainly made a show of it in front of the camera, as she was wont to do, says Barbara in a world exclusive interview. Barbara married Oprah's father Vernon Winfrey in Nashville on June 17, 2000 and Oprah and Stedman Graham were front and center






    +13

    Sad farewell: Barbara Winfrey has been evicted from the marital home in Franklin, Tennessee, she shared with Vernon for over a dozen years. When Oprah called Barbara on her birthday, Oprah told her 'You have until Monday to get out of MY house'




    Now, Barbara is breaking her silence and speaking publicly for the first time about her devastation at what she regards as Oprah’s callous and calculated betrayal.

    In an emotional and wide-ranging interview Barbara has given her account of the dispute, reveals the part Oprah played in ‘destroying’ her marriage, and gives an excoriating insight into the woman behind the global brand.

    Speaking exclusively to MailOnline she said, ‘I have lost everything. It’s not just a house, this is my home. All my memories are here.

    ‘I’m trying to keep it together but there are some days I just don’t understand how I could have made her so angry that she would kick me out on the street and think nothing about it. But that’s Oprah – she’s judge and jury.’





    +13

    Evicted: Barbara was first ordered by the court to vacate her home by March 31. Oprah purchased the house in the name of her company, Overground Railroad LLC, the plaintiff in the case




    A world away from the inspirational figure beloved by millions, the Oprah Barbara describes is manipulative and high-handed, treats family like staff and uses her wealth to control others.

    She claims that Oprah, 60, and longterm partner Stedman Graham, 63, are not bound by romance but a pragmatic cocktail of shared secrets, convenience and money.

    ‘My crime, I think, was to talk to her like a normal person and she didn’t like that one bit'
    - Barbara Winfrey

    She describes Oprah’s relationship with close confidante Gayle King, 59, as ‘bizarre’ and ‘unhealthy,’ and points to it as the reason that neither woman is married.

    And at the heart of it all, Barbara claims, the ‘real Oprah’ - hidden behind the image she projects so well – is a woman unhappy in her skin and, as Barbara has learned to her cost, unforgiving to those who inspire her wrath.

    Barbara said, ‘You find out quickly where your place is with Oprah and you get in that place and you stay in that place.

    ‘My crime, I think, was to talk to her like a normal person and she didn’t like that one bit.’





    +13

    Love-less: 'Love & Blessings' Oprah wrote on this photograph of her and Barbara taken at the superstar's 50th birthday party in Chicago in 2004. But Oprah hasn't shown her stepmother much love in words or deed over the years




    Barbara was Vice Principal at Brentwood High School, a respected public school in Nashville, when she first met Vernon Winfrey.

    Winfrey’s barber shop in a rundown area of East Nashville was a local landmark – it has been there for more than 50 years – and his work as a local councilman made him a well-known figure in the community.

    Barbara recalled: ‘I used to send difficult students to his shop to work there at weekends, sweep floors that sort of thing, help them stay out of trouble.’

    Fifteen years after first meeting him, they reconnected and the passing acquaintance became something more.

    They married on 17 June 2000 in a ceremony at Nashville’s Hermitage Hotel. Looking back, Barbara admitted, ‘I don’t think Oprah really wanted to be there but she couldn’t not be at such a big event. How would that look?’

    Barbara and Oprah’s first meeting some weeks earlier at the star’s Indiana farm had not been easy.





    Oprah's dad tells how Oprah grew up as a child





    Video Souce Davidrush.net





    +13

    Happy days: The red carpet wasn't exactly rolled out for Barbara and Vernon when they were invited to Oprah's Legends Ball. They were seat in a back corner of the second floor and were told not to mingle with the celebrities




    Barbara said, ‘We drove from Nashville to Prairie, Indiana and when you pull up at her house it’s like pulling up to a castle. But that first night she didn’t have anything to say to us hardly at all. She wasn’t warm at all.’

    The next morning Barbara got a taste of the sort of balance of power Oprah expected in their relationship.

    She said, ‘Early the next morning she got on the intercom in her house – she has an intercom in all her houses - and she was calling, ”Barbara, Barbara come down, we’re going for a walk”.

    'Some people can have money and be mentally rich – secure in what they have I guess. But others, how can I put it... some people you can’t take the ghetto out of'
    ‘Gayle was there and the way it worked she walked on one side, Oprah on the other and they peppered me with questions. I felt like I was being interrogated by the FBI. She had a large farm, about 125 acres. By the end of the walk I felt we’d covered the whole farm.’

    Gayle did most of the talking that weekend. Oprah, according to Barbara, largely ignored her and her father – a pattern that would be repeated in visits and social occasions across the years.

    Soon after their marriage, Vernon sold the house in which he had lived with his late wife and, thanks to Oprah, Barbara and Vernon got a place of their own.





    +13

    Palatial: Despite the numerous rooms in Oprah's Santa Barbara mansion, Barbara says she and Vernon were never asked to stay overnight




    Barbara said, ‘It was a new home so we got to choose every part of it. We signed so many documents, became part of the Housing Association. I was thankful of course. I never knew it was Oprah’s name on the deeds and that I was just on probation.’

    Instead with each paper signed the misunderstanding was compounded. Barbara had no idea that her home was a gift never truly given.

    Yet over the years she has come to understand that this is the dynamic on which Oprah’s empire is built.

    She explained, ‘My husband once told me that just because someone gives you something does not mean they love you. He was talking about Oprah.

    ‘Her brand is that she’s a nice, caring, generous, giving person. That’s not how it is. She’s controlling – it’s all about control.

    ‘She has confidentiality agreements with pretty much everybody in her life. She has them sign their life away and she has them in her pocket.





    +13

    Cutting it: Vernon Winfrey has been a barber in East Nashville for half a century. He is a well-respected member of the community



    ‘Everything comes with stipulations but she doesn’t tell you that and she doesn’t tell you what they are.’

    According to Barbara, ‘Some people can have money and be mentally rich – secure in what they have I guess. But others, how can I put it…some people you can’t take the ghetto out of.

    ‘That’s Oprah, it’s who she is and where she’s from. She had money, everybody was going to know it and see it. But she had to be in control.’

    It would be easy to be seduced by the riches of the world in which Oprah lives.

    She has homes in Santa Barbara, Indiana, Hawaii, the Bahamas and Chicago, has owned various properties on Fisher Island, Fla and, until recently, had a home in Aspen.

    'She was a horrible decorator. Money cannot buy you taste. She would put plaid with stripes and all sorts'
    She numbered an Aston Martin and Rolls Royce convertible among her many cars. The 2004 Mercedes that sits in Barbara’s garage is, she said, in Oprah’s name and the Porsche Cayenne Turbo that 81-year-old Vernon drives is thanks to his daughter.

    But for all her very obvious wealth, Barbara said, with thinly veiled relish, ‘She was a horrible decorator.

    ‘Money cannot buy you taste. She would put plaid with stripes and all sorts.

    In Indiana she must have had 200 dolls, some of them looked like they could have gone back to the slave days, lined up on long benches in the hallway. It was creepy.’





    +13

    Then: Barbara claims that Oprah refused to give Vernon the money to renovate his run-down barber shop




    Barbara and Vernon visited four of Oprah’s homes but were only ever invited to stay on Fisher Island and in Indiana. Otherwise, they were put up in hotels.

    And if Barbara’s mistake was to not show Oprah the deference she expected, then it is clear the error was matched and returned by the star. Intentional or not, for Barbara, the slights came thick and fast.

    ‘She complained my sheets didn’t have 1000 thread count when she came to stay and that the bath towels and the coffee cups weren’t big enough,’ she claimed.

    When Oprah threw her Legends’ Ball in Santa Barbara her father and stepmother were not invited to stay in the house but put up in a nearby hotel.

    When they were shown to their table it was not on the main floor with the A listers – John Travolta, Sidney Poitier, Tina Turner, Alicia Keys – but ‘tucked in the corner on the second floor.’

    She added, ‘We weren’t allowed to mingle with the celebrities--but we did.’

    'Her brand is that she’s a nice, caring, generous, giving person. That’s not how it is. She’s controlling – it’s all about control'

    And when she and Vernon arrived at Oprah’s Chicago condo on one occasion she recalled,
    ‘Oprah got on the intercom and announced, “Negroes in the house. Negroes in the house.”

    ‘She thought it was funny. I thought it was insulting. I’m older than her. I know what it means. She was reminding us of our low class.’

    According to Barbara, ‘I’ve seen what happens to people when they step out of their place and fall out with Oprah.

    ‘It wasn’t unusual over the years for her to fly to her house in Hawaii, call Gayle and say, “Fire so and so and so and so and so and so.”

    ‘She never says a word to that person herself. She never tells the person why. She never gives the person the chance to defend themselves and all the “gifts” are snatched back.’

    Pausing, Barbara shook her head: ‘You know I sometimes feel sorry for her because she’s created this world for herself and really, it’s a mess.





    +13

    Now: To help her husband fix up his shabby shop, Barbara says she mortgaged the home she owned outright. Oprah swooped in and bought that home, leaving her stepmother high and dry




    ‘I don’t think she has one relationship in her life that you or I would understand.’

    Alhough Oprah has since bought another house for her father, as far as Barbara was concerned there has always been a distance between Oprah and her father that neither have ever quite managed to bridge. And, in Barbara’s view, Oprah has always had a degree of denial over the circumstances of her childhood and the reality of who she really is.

    It has been reported that Vernon is not Oprah’s biological father.

    Barbara said, ‘Vernon wanted to do the DNA test but Oprah said, “No.” I think she’s afraid because she knows it would prove he IS her father. She can’t quite believe that such a silly man could make such a magnificent creature.

    ‘But Vernon’s her father all right. They have the same big feet, with the same callouses underneath; they have the same bags under their eyes and the same nose. They’re so alike.’

    But according to Barbara, ‘Oprah doesn’t want to know the truth of her past, where she’s from.





    +13

    'Bizarre': When Barbara first met Oprah at her Prairie, Indiana home, she was given the third degree by Oprah--and Gayle. Barbara shares her story about their 'bizarre" relationship in Part 2 of the interview tomorrow




    ‘She’s a human like anybody else but she spends so much energy hiding the real her.’

    It isn’t difficult to see why Barbara might ultimately conclude that her company was not something Oprah had any desire to seek out or endure longer than necessary.

    But it wounded her, she said, to see the celebrity snub her own father time after time.

    For Barbara the final straw came with a trip to South Africa in 2005. She recalled, ‘We were there for some ceremony to do with her school and I have to say that the chance to meet Nelson Mandela was a highlight of my life I will never forget.

    ‘But in eight days she must have spoken to her father for about five minutes, and that was in public to make him stand up as the person who made her who she was.

    ‘I told Vernon, “That’s it. I’m not travelling 23 hours, half way round the world anymore to be ignored by her. I’m done.”’

    It is clear from Barbara’s recollections that her relationship with Oprah, which may have started with hopes of familial fondness, deteriorated into one of strained mutual intolerance.

    When her marriage to Vernon fell apart there was simply no reason to carry on the façade. Yet, Barbara admitted, she had expected some note of sympathy given the circumstances of the split.

    It was the revelation of his weeklong ‘affair’ with a prostitute known as ‘One Tooth’ that was the final undoing of his marriage to Barbara.





    +13

    Unfaithful: Barbara's marriage fell apart when she discovered Vernon cheated on her with a prostitute named 'One Tooth.' Even though they're divorced they still speak once a week. Barbara believes they would have stayed together had Oprah not intervened




    The woman taped her barbershop liaisons with Winfrey and originally intended to blackmail him. Instead the truth came tumbling out three years ago.

    Barbara said, ‘Oprah is a woman who empowers women to be all they can be, to stand up against men who mistreat them.

    ‘If she was a more decent person she would realize that what her dad did was very wrong instead of plotting against me and pushing me out of the scene.’

    At the time Barbara and Vernon were in the midst of rebuilding his barbershop. After 47 years it was in dire need of renovation, Barbara explained.

    Oprah refused to help financially. So Barbara, who worked in education for 32 years before retiring in 2006, secured a loan on a home she owned outright before she married Vernon, as collateral. This was to prove a crucial and costly decision.

    By her own admission Barbara struggled to cope with Vernon’s infidelity. She moved out of the marital bedroom but she was not, she insisted, looking to end her marriage.

    She said, ‘I couldn’t be the wife he wanted me to be but I might have gotten over it.’

    But Vernon, she said, was impatient and, frustrated, left the marital home that summer in a move that, as it turned out, proved final.

    At the same time the couple were struggling to keep up with loan repayments on Barbar's old house, where her daughter and grandchild were living. According to Barbara, rather than step in, Oprah advised her father to let the bank foreclose.

    She explained, ‘She then bought the barbershop and my old house at cut price. Everyone thought she was swooping in to save the day. But she’d stood back and let that day happen.’

    According to Barbara, ‘Vernon had been telling everyone he was unhappy with the marriage. He told Stedman and he told Oprah, so she came up with an escape plan I guess to get me out of the picture, make all the scandal of what he’d done go away.





    +13

    Packing it in: Gathering her belongings in the house she shared with Vernon for 13 years, Barbara isn't sure about her next move




    ‘Vernon is a weak man. He let the situation run away from him.’

    Barbara claimed that Oprah pressed Vernon to resolve the situation and divorce her.

    In June 2012 – on the anniversary of their wedding 12 years earlier - Barbara was blindsided when Vernon filed for divorce citing her unreasonable marital conduct.

    The court rejected his petition and accepted instead one made in response by Barbara.

    She said, ‘The settlement they offered was the house that I had owned but lost, the car I’d had since 2004, with 110,000 miles on the clock and I had to sign a confidentiality agreement.

    ‘Vernon also asked for a chunk of my pension because he claimed I was the main earner in the household.’

    At the time, Barbara’s daughter and five-year-old grandson were living in Barbara's old house, which is now owned by Oprah’s company.

    When Barbara rejected the settlement, she explains, her daughter and grandson were told to leave the property.

    ‘That house lay empty and then it was sold. Tell me, what sort of person does that? I would have walked away quietly but she put my baby and my grandbaby out on the street. That made it personal.’

    Gathering her fury Barbara said, ‘Vernon and I were joined by God. Who does she think she is to interfere in that? Does she think she’s God?’

    The home in which Barbara sits is undeniably impressive. Laurelbrooke is a gated community of Stepford style perfection, with manicured lawns and sweeping driveways leading to homes considered modest if they only have three or four garages.





    +13

    Defeated: Says Barbara: 'I am 66 years old. My credit has been ruined by the foreclosure. Oprah may have the right to do this. But is this the right thing to do?'




    Barbara is aware of how her ‘demands’ might look. Gesturing around the room in which she sits, with vaulted ceilings and a faux baby grand that she ‘plays’ with the flick of a switch, Barbara admitted, ‘I know people have read about this and thought, “Who does she think she is? Why should she get a million dollar home?”

    ‘But can you see it’s not about that? It’s about everything that went before. Look at how she has treated me. I laid my head next to her father for 14 years and she never thought me worthy of talking to.

    ‘Look at how she’s behaved. Can you imagine Bill Gates or Warren Buffet behaving like this? So petty and mean spirited?’

    Perhaps it is inevitable that this divorce like so many should bring out the worst in parties who once attempted to rub along as family.

    As far as Barbara is concerned that is what all this comes down to – not to one woman’s property or fame but the messy, dismantling of a marriage in which the frustrations of years are played out in offer and counteroffer.

    She said, ‘I am 66 years old. My credit was ruined by the foreclosure. Who is going to rent me a home? I have to leave here on 29 May and I really don’t know what will come next.’

    For the first time, the shadow of defeat passes across Barbara’s face,‘Oprah may have the right to do this. But is it the right thing to do?’


    Read more: dailymail.co.uk
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  • Barbara refused to sign a confidentiality agreement with Oprah
  • 'You say I never talk to you,' Oprah told Barbara in a birthday phone call. 'I'm talking to you now. You have until Monday to get out of MY house'
  • When Oprah threw her Legends' Ball, Vernon and Barbara weren't on the main floor with the A-listers but tucked in a corner on the second floor. 'We weren't allowed to mingle with the celebrities,' says Barbara
  • 'It wasn't unusual for Oprah to fly to her house in Hawaii, call Gayle (King) and say, "Fire so and so and so and so." Oprah and Gayle's relationship is "bizarre",' says Barbara
  • Oprah was never willing to take a DNA test to prove Vernon is her real dad. 'She can't believe such a silly man would make such a magnificent creature'
  • 'Oprah complained that my sheets didn't have 1000 thread and the bath towels and coffee cups weren't big enough,' Barbara says



  • To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/23/2014 3:02:37 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     
    I’ll vote Democrat because I’m not concerned about millions of babies being aborted so long as we keep all death row inmates alive and comfy.



    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/23/2014 3:09:23 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     



    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/24/2014 7:30:34 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     
    Barack Obama, the adolescent president
    ................................................................................

    By George F. Will, Published: April 23 2014
    washingtonpost.com

    Recently, Barack Obama — a Demosthenes determined to elevate our politics from coarseness to elegance; a Pericles sent to ameliorate our rhetorical impoverishment — spoke at the University of Michigan. He came to that very friendly venue — in 2012, he received 67?percent of the vote in Ann Arbor’s county — after visiting a local sandwich shop, where a muse must have whispered in the presidential ear. Rep.?Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) had recently released his budget, so Obama expressed his disapproval by calling it, for the benefit of his academic audience, a “meanwich” and a “stinkburger.”

    Try to imagine Franklin Roosevelt or Dwight Eisenhower or John Kennedy or Ronald Reagan talking like that. It is unimaginable that those grown-ups would resort to japes that fourth-graders would not consider sufficiently clever for use on a playground.

    Obama talks like an arrested-development adolescent.

    The four basic teenage tropes are the only arrows in Obama’s overrated rhetorical quiver. He employed them all last week when he went to the White House briefing room to exclaim, as he is wont to do, about the excellence of the Affordable Care Act.

    First came the invocation of a straw man. Celebrating the ACA’s enrollment numbers, Obama, referring to Republicans, charged: “They said nobody would sign up.” Of course, no one said this. Obama often is what political philosopher Kenneth Minogue said of an adversary — “a pyromaniac in a field of straw men.”

    Adolescents also try to truncate arguments by saying that nothing remains of any arguments against their arguments. Regarding the ACA, Obama said the debate is “settled” and “over.” Progressives also say the debate about catastrophic consequences of man-made climate change is “over,” so everyone should pipe down. And they say the debates about the efficacy of universal preschool, and the cost-benefit balance of a minimum-wage increase, are over. Declaring an argument over is so much more restful than engaging with evidence.

    A third rhetorical move by argumentative adolescents is to declare that there is nothing to argue about because everything is going along swimmingly. Seven times Obama asserted that the ACA is “working.” That is, however, uninformative because it is ambiguous. The ethanol program is “working” in the sense that it is being implemented as its misguided architects intended. Nevertheless, the program is a substantial net subtraction from the nation’s well-being. The same can be said of sugar import quotas, or agriculture subsidies generally, or many hundreds of other government programs that are, unfortunately, “working.”

    Finally, the real discussion-stopper for the righteous — and there is no righteousness like an adolescent’s — is an assertion that has always been an Obama specialty. It is that there cannot be honorable and intelligent disagreement with him. So last week, less than two minutes after saying that the argument about the ACA “isn’t about me,” Obama said some important opposition to the ACA is about him, citing “states that have chosen not to expand Medicaid for no other reason than political spite.”

    This, he said, must be spiteful because expanding Medicaid involves “zero cost to these states.” Well. The federal government does pay the full cost of expansion — for three years. After that, however, states will pay up to 10 percent of the expansion’s costs, which itself will be a large sum. And the 10 percent figure has not been graven on stone by the finger of God. It can be enlarged whenever Congress wants, as surely it will, to enable more federal spending by imposing more burdens on the states. Yet Obama, who aspired to tutor Washington about civility, is incapable of crediting opponents with other than base motives.

    About one thing Obama was right, if contradictory. He said Americans want politicians to talk about other subjects — but that Democrats should campaign by celebrating the wondrousness of the ACA. This would be candid because it is what progressivism is — a top-down, continent-wide tissue of taxes, mandates and other coercions. Is the debate about it over? Not quite.







    Read more about this topic:

    Charles Krauthammer: Rhetoric vs. reality

    Eugene Robinson: Obamacare i



    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/25/2014 4:14:01 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     
    Cliven Bundy racist? Not
    .........................................................

    Examiner ^ | 4/25/2014 | James Simpson




    Play

    Unedited Bundy remarksCliven Bundy







    The Black Sphere April 25, 2014


    The Left adores its "racism" narrative. It is practically the only narrative they have left,and they have used it repeatedly like a cheap prostitute at a party for sex addicts.


    One of the cheapest political whores on the national scene is Dirty Harry "Cleanface" Reid, the ignoble, utterly corrupt U.S. Senate Majority "Leader." Harry has now added his wormy voice to the cacaphony of leftist sluts calling Cliven Bundy "racist." Let's get our facts straight.

    The Left is able to promote this narrative for two main reasons: 1. they lie. 2. the media repeats the lie. So let's dissect their lie about Bundy. How did they lie? As usual, they edited remarks to create the perception they want, using only that portion of Bundy's remarks where he intimated that blacks were better off under slavery. They carefully left out the portion that put the statement in context.

    Let's also acknowledge something the Left never will in their vicious campaign to slander people who have the audacity to threaten their franchise. The Left cares little about the target individual, or the inconvenient facts that may humanize him somewhat. You can't cultivate sympathy for one you want to destroy. Cliven Bundy is not a wealthy man. He is not an educated man. He has not had decades in the practiced art of prevarication that is the Left's stock in trade - in fact one of the only things the Left does well. He is a simple man who simply expresses his opinion, without careful word crafting, without considering that there is an entire industry out there with nothing better to do than put his words under a microscope so they can misrepresent them for their own unscrupulous purposes.

    In fact, Bundy was trying to say what many have said for decades, i.e. that the Left has created a nightmare for the black community, and that many blacks are much worse off today than they were before the great liberal welfare experiment of the 1960s.The welfare state is primarily responsible for destroying the nuclear black family, and endemic crime, drug addiction and unemployment are the direct result.

    Prior to President Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" welfare expansion, the unemployment rate for young blacks was lower than that for whites. Out of wedlock pregancies were a fraction of what they are now, and crime and drug addiction, while problematic in inner cities, were nowhere near today's levels.

    Democratic politicians justify the burgeoning welfare state as reflecting compassion for the “poor and oppressed,” but the fact is that the Left created the welfare state deliberately and specifically to capture the minority vote forever. The infamous socialist authors of the " Crisis Strategy," Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, had much to do with this, and they admitted as much, saying, “If organizers can deliver millions of dollars in cash benefits to the ghetto masses, it seems reasonable to expect that the masses will deliver their loyalties to their benefactors.” It worked. In 1960, only 58 percent of black voters were Democrats. By 1968, 92 percent were Democrats and only three percent were Republicans.

    In 1961, Cloward co-founded an experimental welfare program called "Mobilization for Youth." Presidents Kennedy and Johnson used his model to envision a massive federal infrastructure that would both fund leftwing activism and buy off minorities. What followed was President Johnson’s “War on Poverty,” and the Office of Economic Opportunity created to implement it. OEO financed "10,000 organizations employing several hundred thousand people” to radically transform U.S. policy outside the political process, according to conservative activist Howard Phillips, who ran OEO in 1973. He identified Cloward and Piven as OEO’s “ideological architects.”

    If you have not read Cloward and Piven's treatise on the Crisis strategy, you should do so now. Once Johnson established the welfare state, Cloward and Piven pointed out that government could never meet promises it had made if everyone who qualified for welfare demanded it. They stated that minorities could precipitate systemic crisis and collapse, creating the pretext for a "guaranteed annual income," i.e. socialism. This was Cloward and Piven's real goal all along,and they helped found the National Welfare Rights Organization and ACORN to execute it. The rest, as they say, is history, and today’s epidemic of welfare fraud, waste, crime, overspending and decaying inner cities can be laid directly at the Left's feet. So Bundy's remarks were not far off.

    Bundy is not a polished pundit. His statement about slavery was clumsy, but that's it. He qualified it by saying that "we've progressed quite a bit from that day until now, and we sure don't want to go back," and further qualified it by describing his compassion for the blacks who are victims, not perpetrators. Under welfare, he said, they have no purpose, and "that's all government, it's not freedom." Of illegal immigrants he said "They're here, and they're people, and I've worked side-by-side with a lot of them. Don't tell me they don't work and don't tell me they don't pay taxes. And don't tell me they don't have better family structures than most of us white people." Sadly, that is a true statement.

    Bundy is no racist. Here are the words of a black man who knows him personally. The photo he refers to is posted above:

    The media distorts information to the point of social division. This is a photo of myself and the resilient, often charismatic, and maybe not so tactful Cliven Bundy. He’s a cowboy and a helluva family man, not an orator. One thing he definitely isn’t – a racist. I found his comments to not only be NOT racist, but his own view of his experiences. Who the heck are we to determine another man’s perspective on the world around him?! Just because Picasso’s view of the world was abstract, does it negate the fact that his art was genuine? Furthermore, if you take the time to do your own research, you’ll find that his statements about some black Americans actually hold weight. He posed a hypothetical question. He said, “I wonder IF” … Hell, I’m black and I often wonder about the same about the decline of the black family. Bottom line is that we are all slaves in this waning republic, no matter our skin color.

    Sorry, lefties, Bundy's are not the words of a racist. They are the words of a simple, honest man speaking his mind. That he can't use 50 cent words may be an advantage for the Left, but as usual, it is only because the Left is willing to stoop so low in its never-ending rhetorical war with America. The liberal plantation is a slave state that the worst slave-owners couldn't have imagined, because they at least wanted their slaves to work. All the Left wants is votes, and the only way to guarantee that is to keep minorities, and increasingly the rest of us, in perpetual poverty.

    The corrupt hypocrite, "Cleanface" Dirty Harry Reid, and many fellow leftists, stand to gain personally from the solar power developments planned for that part of Nevada. BLM land surrounding the Bundy ranch is to be used as a sanctuary to mitigate the ill effects of the environment-killing solar farms. Reid's ulterior motives are shamefully obvious.



    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/25/2014 5:28:42 PM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     
    Driver that struck teen suing dead boy's family
    ...............................................................................................
    Toronto Sun ^ | APRIL 25, 2014 | TRACY MCLAUGHLIN


    ALCONA - Still in the throes of agony from losing their son in a vehicle crash, the parents of young Brandon Majewski are now reeling after they learned the woman who struck and killed him is suing their dead child.

    “I feel like someone kicked me in the stomach – I’m over the edge,” the dead boy’s father Derek Majewski said.

    As he sits in his immaculate Alcona home sifting through piles of photographs of his son, the heartache shows on his face and he can hardly contain his tears as he speaks.

    Just down the road, on the side of a quiet country stretch of Innisfil Beach Rd., is a memorial complete with a bicycle, flowers and photographs of his son Brandon.

    The spunky, handsome, 17-year-old bike enthusiast was out with his two buddies on Oct. 28, 2012 when they hopped on their bicycles to go for hotdogs on a drizzly, dark night around 1:30 a.m.

    Brandon was struck dead-on by an SUV and killed while his friend Richard McLean, 16, was seriously injured with broken bones and pelvis. His other pal Jake Roberts, 16, was hit but sustained only scratches.

    Now the driver of the SUV, Sharlene Simon, a mother of three, is suing the dead boy for the emotional trauma it has caused her.

    She’s also suing the two other boys, as well as the dead boy’s parents, and even his brother, who has since died. She’s also suing the County of Simcoe for failing to maintain the road.

    Even the family’s lawyer is in shock.

    “In all of my years as a lawyer, I have never seen anyone ever sue a child that they killed,” Barrie lawyer Brian Cameron said. “It’s beyond the pale.”

    In fact, he couldn’t even call the family to tell them the news this week.

    “I just couldn’t bring myself to tell them on the phone.”

    After a face-to-face meeting Tuesday, the parents and stepparents left his office almost staggering in disbelief.

    “I’m devastated, I’m in shock,” said Brandon's mother, Venetta Mlynczyk, a dental assistant who is drowning in sorrow. “She killed my child and now she wants to profit from it? She says she’s in pain? Tell her to look inside my head and she will see pain, she will see panic, she will see nightmares.”

    “It blows my mind,” Brandon’s stepmom, Lisa Tessier, said. “We are all devastated. This is so cruel.”

    In a statement of claim filed with the courts, Simon is claiming $1.35-million in damages due to her psychological suffering, including depression, anxiety, irritability and post traumatic stress. She blames the boys for negligence.

    “They did not apply their brakes properly,” the claim states. “They were incompetent bicyclists."

    Simon's lawyer yet to return a call from the Toronto Sun.

    Brandon’s father shakes his head.

    “They’re kids!” he gasps. “And they have a right to make mistakes ... it was a wet, dark road – what about slowing down?”

    He insists the reflectors on the bikes would have been visible.

    A South Simcoe Police report shows Simon was driving at an estimated 90 km/h in an 80-km zone.

    The report also states: “no breathalyzer was performed” – a point the lawyer intends to delve deeper into, he says.

    Her husband, Jules Simon, a York Regional Police officer, was driving behind his wife that night, but little is mentioned about him as a witness in the police report. He pulled over when Brandon was struck, and shortly after both were allowed to go home. It was another witness who pulled over to tend to Brandon and called 911.

    Two hours later, after Brandon lay dead in hospital from multiple traumatic injuries, police knocked on the door of his home.

    The dogs began to bark. It was late.

    “I knew,” says his father, and his voice breaks again. “I had a gut feeling.”

    Therapy, medication, even booze, doesn’t dull the pain.

    And then, six months after the funeral, he awoke to find his second son Devon, 23, who had just graduated as a paralegal, laying in his bed, blue and dead, after popping too many pills and drinking too many shots. Not an intended suicide, they are certain – he was just trying to stifle his grief.

    “This has ripped our family apart,” says Majewski. “And now this woman has the gall to try to profit from our dead child she killed? Profit from another boy who was almost crippled?”

    He flips again through the family photographs. Happy times of fishing, dirt biking, swimming, eating birthday cake, laughing. He chuckles for a moment when he remembers all the bikes his son rebuilt – sometimes he would sneak the parts right into his bedroom, and shine them till they gleamed. All another world away.

    “This thing haunts us,” he says. “It will never stop haunting us.”

    Cameron has launched a routine lawsuit against the driver, mainly for medical and funeral costs on behalf of the boys and their families. He alleges Simon was speeding and may have been intoxicated and talking on her cell phone.

    “Sharlene Simon failed to take reasonable care to avoid a collision which she saw or should have seen was likely to occur,” his claim states. “She operated the motor vehicle while she was intoxicated.”

    None of the allegations have been tested in court.



    Brandon Majewski



    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/28/2014 10:52:18 AM
    From: joseffy  Respond to of 16547
     
    Psychotic Nation: Why Big Pharma Targets Lower-Class Children

    .....................................................................................................
    occupycorporatism.com ^ | April 26, 2014 | Susanne Posel



    The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), implemented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) have released a report detailing how an estimated 7.5% of US children ages 6 to 17 are currently prescribed psychotropic mood stabilizers for alleged emotional or behavioral problems.

    This translates to 1 in 13 school-aged children in the US are taking at least one major pharmaceutical on the basis that their behavior is not appropriate and necessities medical attention.

    Data concerning 2011 and 2012 from 17,000 children was provided to the NHIS for this study.

    It was shown in the study that white, non-Hispanic; males were most likely to have a diagnosis of a behavioral disorder, while 4.0% of older female children were being prescribed psychotropic drugs.

    Those children on Medicaid or CHIP coverage were 9.9% more likely to have prescribed medications than those who came from families that could afford private health insurance.

    LaJeana Howie, statistical researcher for the NCHS commented : “We can’t advise parents on what they should do, but I think it’s positive that over half of parents reported that medications helped ‘a lot,’”

    The intimation by the researchers is that attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is represented as the majority of diagnosis; which would validate the argument that ADHD is over-diagnosed and as a result the children are over-medicated for issues that may not necessarily pertain to them.

    In fact, 9.2% of impoverished children were prescribed psychotropic drugs where the household income was at 100 – 200% of the poverty line.

    Shockingly, it was also shown how the parents’ perception of their children’s behavior great determined whether or not the child would be forced to take drugs to control their moods.

    (Excerpt) Read more at occupycorporatism.com ...





    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/28/2014 6:04:18 PM
    From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547
     
    Michelle Obama spotted at the Salamander Resort in Middleburg

    Monday, April 28, 2014 5:36:15 PM · by 2ndDivisionVet · 23 replies
    The Washington Post's The Reliable Source ^ | April 28, 2014 | Helena Andrews





    To: Carolyn who wrote (9744)4/29/2014 12:10:30 PM
    From: joseffy2 Recommendations

    Recommended By
    Qualified Opinion
    The1Stockman

      Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16547