Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zen Dollar Round who wrote (168906)	4/25/2014 12:35:38 PM
From: slacker711	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213177

I'll again point to MSFT as an example. Please tell me how it would have risen 39,483% since inception to April 1, 2014 without all the stock splits, I'd really like to know. Berkshire Hathaway seemed to do ok without any splits. Moreover, I do think that a $100,000 share price makes little sense, but I dont think taking an argument to the extreme really helps anybody. I doubt advocates of a split would have been happy with a 1000 to 1 split either. Personally, I dont think it matters one way or another. There is no downside besides a tiny amount of extra administrative costs due to more shareholders. Slacker