Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (782431)	4/28/2014 4:17:44 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577905

>> Everything would have been OK had the father been allowed to just take his kid away and not be harassed by law enforcement. Of course, the kid and the mother would object, but hey, it's just a family affair and the state should not interfere, right? But Ten, I don't see how that is in any way analogous to the case where drug enforcement agents break down the door of an INNOCENT person's home (even if in error) and shoot him dead. If law enforcement can reasonably judge that a person's life is in danger and, and they can kill the perpetrator and end the threat, or if they judge it is best thing to do for the victims, then one can see it. I really don't see how you view these as similar circumstances.