Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Picanoc who wrote (8677)	12/12/1997 3:29:00 PM
From: Feline	Respond to of 10482

Yeah, and why would they sell gold only to end up with other currencies? They can print as much US$ as they want!

To: Picanoc who wrote (8677)	12/12/1997 3:32:00 PM
From: twocents	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10482

The info in your last 2 posts is much appreciated. It's the first time I've seen any questioning of the Rothschild article. Thanks Dave

To: Picanoc who wrote (8677)	12/12/1997 3:52:00 PM
From: IngotWeTrust	Respond to of 10482

I remain unconvinced by your rebuttal. My source is none other than the Annual Gold Field Minerals shadow CB research agency, who publishes their information regularly and has made categorical and logical case for years for "total lack of accountability statement", which I admittedly have repeated in this forum. I have made no secret of my admiration of Gold Fields Mineral's reports over the years. In point of fact, they have revealed CB sales that were unreported by self-same CB's upto 9 months after GFM's reporting. These type of confirmation after the initial cat is let out of the bag by GFM is quite credibility enhancing. Wouldn't you agree? I'd appreciate learning of the source of your stated contradictory opinion. In this manner, folks can pursue sources at their leisure. RE: The Rothchilds article, I read it with an eye for accuracy, as I have a personal connection to those circles withwhom I'm in frequent contact. I saw nothing in that article, including the "mad math" as you characterize it to dispute, nor does my contact. Thks, anyhow, 4 Ur respectful reply. Regards, O/49r