Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (782616)	4/29/2014 1:49:44 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577589

Inode, But these drugs must be regulated because the addictive properties are far too strong (unlike mj, which is not addictive). If nicotine is addictive, then so is marijuana, the effects of which are stronger. The black market would go away but you would have more addiction because many people who can control any other substance cannot control opiates. The fact that many more people would be addicted would then drive the need for more regulation, which once again fosters a black market. Best way is to reduce demand, since controlling supply is like trying to cut a head off of a leviathan. More heads will grow. But the funny thing about addiction is that by definition, addiction IS demand. In fact, it's the most extreme kind. How are you going to control demand when you say, "Oh yeah, all of this is legal, have at it?" Tenchusatsu