SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (782694)4/29/2014 6:33:58 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577843
 
The marijuana of today is many, many times more potent than what i-node may have puffed in the 70s. They have bred the plant strictly for its psychoacitve ingredients. This is all on google. Southern California is supposed to have the most powerful weed that has ever been created. So Cal is considered a mecca for smokers.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (782694)4/29/2014 6:34:16 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1577843
 
>> If you think nicotine is stronger and more addictive than marijuana, then there is no use discussing with you the relative dangers between different drugs.

If you think tobacco is even in the same ballpark as marijuana as far as the danger to society, I agree, there is no point in discussing it.



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (782694)4/30/2014 1:40:38 AM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1577843
 
You're a total idiot as far as knowing anything about marijuana, which you've never even tried. Tobacco contains nicotine, a physically addicting chemical which is a known powerful carcinogen, causing cancer. Ponder that, that we allow corporations to sell a physically addictive chemical that kills people by causing a horrible disease.

Marijuana doesn't contain nicotine.