Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: john t orton who wrote (5491)	12/12/1997 4:55:00 PM
From: Ed Pettee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10368

John, I believe your referring to the 2:00 PM news conference called by the AG. In talking to the "The State" that will be in tomorrows news paper. As I understand it, he the AG called off his threat to arrest anybody on 12/15 and will not pursue his threat in that manner. He stated that his goal is to get the Supreme Court to rule on whether Video Poker is a lottery and illegal under the state constitution, and he felt that he could best do this by joining with the group that has filed a class action against the industry yesterday. I 'll have to wait for tommorrows paper for fuller details, however the paper did comment in its editorial page today.

To: john t orton who wrote (5491)	12/12/1997 5:10:00 PM
From: IGL	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10368

>> To: All From: John Orton, CFO There has been a major favorable development in S.C. re: the state A.G.position and plan of action re: video gaming. Check the local S.C. news forcomplete information. jto<< thestate.com Is this what he calls "favorable development"? This does not sound good at all. Someone please comment on this article. igl

To: john t orton who wrote (5491)	12/12/1997 6:15:00 PM
From: jimmy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10368

JTO, given the political climate in SC, what steps have the company taken to ensure that all of its video games are operated legally? I am especially referring to the $125 payout limit. Do you monitor your game room operators in any way? What kind of compliance program do you have in place to educate, monitor, and discipline your employees (or contractors). It would be reassuring to see the company publicly address this timely issue.