Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: chartseer who wrote (167882)	5/5/2014 11:14:02 AM
From: chartseer	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 224749

Is it strange how bobble head parsed her words? We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. .We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with

To: chartseer who wrote (167882)	5/5/2014 2:25:47 PM
From: FJB	3 Recommendations Recommended By locogringo TideGlider Wayners Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

Hillary Language On Benghazi Identical To Rhodes Email — 1 1/2 Days Before! On September 13, 2012, — one and a half days before Obama aide Ben Rhodes sent an email advising UN Ambassador Susan Rice to blame the Benghazi attacks on a protest over an anti-Muslim Internet video — Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used the identical language embedded in a statement about the attacks. The congruence of the two word-for-word statements suggests, at the very least, a close coordination between and White House and Hillary Clinton to deceive the American people about the true nature of the attack in Benghazi. And it may also be evidence that Hillary Clinton engineered that decision immediately following the attacks. Was the cover-up Hillary’s idea? The emails beg the question. Now Congress must investigate and decide what the answer is. dickmorris.com