SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (783547)5/5/2014 3:55:15 PM
From: i-node1 Recommendation

Recommended By
one_less

  Respond to of 1579049
 
>> Using new DNA analysis they have been finding people constantly that were convicted of all sorts of crimes that were innocent.

Not "innocent".

Not guilty.

Two entirely different things. Many of these people are being freed years after the fact because they win new trials and the evidence they were convicted on can be refuted by DNA evidence. That doesn't make them innocent. That means they may not have been proven guilty.

While everyone ought to be concerned about innocent people being executed, the truth is innocent people get executed every single day on our streets. 50 kids aged 14 and under have been executed in Chicago in the last year. Not one of their killers has received a death sentence, let alone been executed.



To: koan who wrote (783547)5/5/2014 4:42:46 PM
From: d[-_-]b6 Recommendations

Recommended By
bentway
dave rose
FJB
i-node
joseffy

and 1 more member

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579049
 
When someone kills and is captured on video (which is becoming more common today) I have no issues with sending that person to the head of the line and executing them without further wastes of taxpayer money. Same for when there are dozens of witnesses like in the Fort Hood shootings or Gabrielle Giffords shooting.