Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (50782)	5/6/2014 2:07:23 PM
From: teevee	2 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 longz Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

I did that just last summer with a friend who took me up in his Cessna 206 up over Alberta. We didn't see any reclamation at all. We flew over much of the affected area at about 1000' AGL. A nice three hour flight. LOL....that should tell you how good a job has been done over the areas already reclaimed as you couldn't recognize them from natural areas.

To: Eric who wrote (50782)	5/6/2014 4:17:16 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 86356

Why are you wasting fossil fuels like that?

To: Eric who wrote (50782)	5/6/2014 5:20:11 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86356

For somebody who claims to be concerned about CO2, you certainly do a lot of things that produce a lot of it. Perhaps you should have a checklist of your CO2 activities. I, who don't care about CO2, produce hardly any of the stuff. I do breathe, but don't weigh much and have not been very active in aerobic exercize in recent years. You are lacking situational awareness. One of the reasons you and Al Gore have been unpersuasive about CO2 is the level of hypocrisy. You sort of talk a reasonable game [if people don't think about it or understand science] but they do know hypocrisy and fake hockey sticks produced by data concealment and conspiracy. Landshark is unpersuasive because he has no idea how to even consider actual facts. His "argument" is "schlock!", "Old guy", "Yawn!" "Not peer reviewed" etc. Nobody is convinced by such content-free comment. Mqurice