Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (783750)	5/6/2014 11:22:54 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1575596

W was a liar, or he was a dupe. Which would you prefer, Dave? My liedar says liar, and said liar at the time.

To: i-node who wrote (783750)	5/7/2014 2:32:51 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	1 Recommendation Recommended By bentway Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1575596

I know that is a popular view amongst nutjobs. But there is just no evidence at all to support that claim. And Bush can be blamed for a lot of shit, but he wasn't a liar. That's not a view, that's a fact which you can verify by doing a little googling......I've done it several times for you and yours so do it yourself this time........hint...google Hans Blix,. And Bush was a liar every time he sent a rep to the Sunday talk shows to claim there were WMD and we knew where they were.... He was a liar every morning in his speeches when he interchanged the names Saddam and Osama thereby convincing 70% of the public that Saddam was involved in or responsible for 911....