SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Grosz who wrote (8416)12/12/1997 6:04:00 PM
From: Robert New  Respond to of 25814
 
Finally some positive news. Evidently CEO Corrigan just recently purchased 100K shares of yes LSI Logic at $23/avg price per share as per John Dessauer 6p.m. hotline. Guess we will see a pop at the open. Currently has LSI listed as a STRONG BUY.

I would agree that the stock would have to close at $19 to be official. Its not over until its over. Tax selling sure taking a toll though...



To: Michael Grosz who wrote (8416)12/12/1997 6:16:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson  Respond to of 25814
 
What??!! No concession speeches going in to the Weekend??!! The SLCs are tenacious critters, to be sure... OK, we will give you one last shot, early next week, before we fire up the bar-b-que <g>... Gad, I do love Lion meat!! <gg> But of course the contest does go on... Ta da,... Lion meat, Lion meat... gad I LOVE that lion meat!... <g> TSO



To: Michael Grosz who wrote (8416)12/12/1997 6:20:00 PM
From: E. Graphs  Respond to of 25814
 
Michael,

You are absolutely right! 19 or less versus 27 or more and nuthin' in between >:)

SOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooo...............

Yes! that means that the SLC is still winning! And here's some proof for those lawyers out there posing as silicon investors. Just note that the number 18 was graciously changed to 19 in order to make it easier for the mangy bears to try and win.
This change can be found in a later post.

exchange2000.com

See? ......nothing devious about it at all :)

E



To: Michael Grosz who wrote (8416)12/12/1997 6:53:00 PM
From: Duane L. Olson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25814
 
Michael..let me explain.. The rules of the contest had to be set such that there would at least one member on the Negative side. The lowest point at which "takers" could be found was 19... Earier proposals have no bearing.. Oooooo I feel a GRACIOUS concession speech or two coming about Tuesday!! <g> TSO