SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Land Shark who wrote (50912)5/8/2014 10:55:59 AM
From: Hawkmoon1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 86355
 
Oversimplification...
Because you can't seem to handle anything else..

There's no shortage of nutrients there as cyanobacteria are thriving.

And sure there are dead zones.. A lot of them are called HN/LC zones.. Low Chlorophyll..

Add some Iron, let the phytoplankton proliferate, consume CO2, and oxygenate the water..

Duhh....!!!

Right now you have a lot of doubt.. but it's based on literally NO credible data..

The research into Iron Fertilization has barely been performed.. A few half-@ssed attempts and then claiming that no impact was registered..

But 226 million Salmon were harvested last year, as compared to a mere 50 some million the previous year.. Clearly the Haida experiment had a major impact..

Hawk



To: Land Shark who wrote (50912)5/8/2014 11:30:45 AM
From: Eric  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86355
 
LOL!

We just have to look at the massive "dead zone" as the Mississippi dumps into the Gulf..

All those farmers in the Midwest..

We have problems up on Puget Sound with runoff from folks here who like to fertilize their lawns..

That will be going away sometime soon with new State regs here in Washington.

Eric