Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (51317)	5/13/2014 12:34:59 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86355

Mann, Jones and Hansen bear the same relationship to Einstein, Feynman and Popper as a naughty weekend with a prostitute does to marriage and family. This is not how the National Science Academy views them. I'll believe them over some the rantings of some crackpot card-carrying teabagger any day of the week and all day long.

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (51317)	5/13/2014 12:39:30 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

"people like to wear the cloak of science when they are just being religionists. Michael Mann with his Mann Made Warming for example" LMAO. No, deniers like to claim AGW is a religion because that's all they have to fall back on. Science is testable, and Mann's work has been tested and replicated some ?23 times. Funny how Gravity isn't a religion, nor Atoms and Electrons. "The reason science is getting a bad name" is because of carbon pimps like Exxon and the Kochs are pumping millions of dollars into the PR industry to lie about it. "Mann, Jones and Hansen bear the same relationship to Einstein, Feynman and Popper" as Watson and Crick have with Hodgkin and Huxley, except Popper wasn't a scientist, and is the only one who didn't get the Nobel Prize.