Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (784754)	5/14/2014 1:42:26 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576164

Where we disagree is not on these very simple facts, but on details like "how much" and "for how long in the future" and "with what effect" and, to some extent, "what happened in the distant past", but most importantly, on "what should the politicians do now". We don't necessarily disagree. My position on global warming has always been the same. There is a possibility that GW is a false theory; that we are not experiencing GW. I think 5-10% of scientists agree with that premise. However, we do know that burning fossil fuels can lead to the degradation of the environment and hurt humans. So then, even though we are not 100% sure that GW is upon us, we do know that humans will benefit if we reduce the burning of fossil fuels. So why not do it for that reason?