SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (784894)5/15/2014 9:12:07 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573150
 
Minimum wage order sends veterans packing from nursing homes
..........................................................................................................
May 08, 2014 By Gerry May KTBS.com


SHREVEPORT, La -

Some military veterans are being forced to leave their nursing home. It's an unintended consequence of President Obama's executive order in February to raise the minimum wage for new federal contract workers from $7.25 to $10.10 an hour.

Sandy Franks, public affairs officer at Shreveport's Overton Brooks V. A. Medical Center, explains that nursing homes that have contracts for subsidized care from the Veterans Administration become federal contractors. If they refuse to raise their wages, their contracts will not be renewed.

Former Marine A.J. Crain just wheeled himself into his new room at Shreveport Manor on Mansfield Road when he got the news that the home's contract will end this month.

"We fought all your wars, and now we're broke. Where do we go from here?" Crain asks.

"We gotta go. Simple as that. We gotta go," says Vietnam War Bronze Star and Purple Heart recipient John Washington.

"I think it's very wrong. I think it's very distasteful," Washington goes on to say about Shreveport Manor's decision. "I mean some of these people here work their backsides off to keep this place going," he said, pointing to a woman changing his bed.

Shreveport Manor is owned by Gamble Guest Care. Their Chief Operating Officer says if they raise wages for workers there, they have to do that at all eight of their facilities.

In a statement, Gamble COO Matt Machen said, in part, "The additional labor expenses are simply unaffordable. As such, many long term care providers have indicated that they will no longer seek or renew V.A. contracts."

Franks at the V.A. agrees that this has the potential to be a national problem as more V.A. contracts with nursing homes expire.

Article



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (784894)5/15/2014 9:31:40 AM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
d[-_-]b

  Respond to of 1573150
 
Minimum wage laws always hurt those that have jobs.

Order of consequence for the employee

(1st ) -- Yay! I am getting a raise!

(2nd ) --What do you mean I can't work 40 hours a week???!??! You are cutting me to below what I was making before the raise!

(3rd ) --I am being fired and you're putting in a machine?



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (784894)5/15/2014 9:48:27 AM
From: joseffy2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1573150
 
Hashtag Hypocrites Mocked Christian Warnings on Africa For Decades
............................................................................................................................
Dignitas News Service ^ | May 14, 2014 | Paul M Winters


There is no greater or more skillful opportunist in the world today than the American liberal-progressive.

One cant cant go anywhere without seeing proud and self-righteous liberals adorning pins, notebooks folders or their social media pages with#bringbackourgirls, which of course is meant to give all of us a lesson in the importance of compassion and international awareness. While much good can come from an international campaign of publicity against the evils of Boko Haram, the very same liberal hashtag hypocrites basking in their self-importance have spend the past two decades turning a blind eye and mocking conservative Christian groups who have been warning us of the persecution of Christians in the third world.

In a pattern that is becoming all too familiar, the progressive left has long dismissed the legitimate concerns raised by Christians as "rantings of Bible-Thumpers" assuming that any issue raised by a messenger they long ago took sides against is unworthy of their time or thought, only to jump in when it becomes a cause célèbre so they can display their compassion and "global awareness" as proof positive of their benevolence and gentle righteousness.

The next phase is then to turn this phony compassion into political demagoguery and attacking the right wing for its perceived ambivalence on an issue they have mocked conservatives for for years.

A perfect example of this was given on an episode of HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, when the hyper-partisan Maher attempted his usual digs at conservatives while interviewing actor/producer George Clooney, in this piece speaking of the latter's work in the Sudan as Maher hints at a familiar liberal talking point as he insinuates that conservatives are incapable of empathy of people who are "not like them at all" as a reason behind (Maher's assumptive) ambivalence toward the importance of Clooney's work in Darfur. The video speaks for itself.

Video found @: mrctv.org



Conservatives were particularly upset and offended at the sudden burst of crocodile tears. As the "hashtag" campaign regarding the horrific kidnappings and forced conversion of Christian schoolgirls by Islamic radicals (conveniently leaving that aspect of the crime out) has in fact helped the overall cause of freeing the girls and bringing the monsters of Boko Haram to justice, we are left to wonder if the cries of Christian conservatives had been heeded earlier, and not mocked, would we have been able to prevent these horrors from occurring in the first place.

"Our Republican friends have perhaps been better on Africa than my party," Ben Affleck

The frustration and disgust with the obvious display of hypocrisy and posturing by the left caused a reaction from much of us on the right that, ironically enough, provided liberals with an opening to further exploit their new-found interest in Africa for political gain. Many conservative outlets, including Dignitas News Service, jumped on this story the day it happened, when the number of kidnapped girls was already a shocking 100, and not the 300 number that caused much of the liberal side to join in with such gusto. Columnist Ann Coulter's campaign to point out this hypocrisy was understood by the choir, but ultimately backfired on her (and the right) among much of the short-attention span public. Rather than being seen as calling the left out on their faux concern, liberals used it to paint Coulter as uncaring at best, racist at worst. Many conservatives found Coulter's methods as opportunistic and counterproductive to the conservative cause. When conservative commentator Rush Limbaugh took to the airwaves to similarly point out progressive exploitation of the crisis, the attacks went even further, with a skillfully coordinated social network campaign designed to specifically tag Limbaugh as a racist who was looking to undermine the #bringbackourgirls campaign.

For members of the black community and the twenty-something $200 tee-shirt wearing white urban professional that Democrats depend on for their political power, this was a fairly easy case to make. Neither of these constituencies are listeners of Rush and are unaware of the numerous times he's addressed these issues in the past, or that his own brother, David Limbaugh, is the author of 2004's Persecution: How Liberals Are Waging War Against Christianity. While much of the book related to the left's efforts against the faithful in America, he prophetically points out how progressive hatred of the followers of Jesus of Nazareth blinds them to the very real and valid concerns raised in regards to anti-Christian terror perpetrated in Nigeria and throughout much of Africa.

As Christians and sincere believers regardless of faith, the best that we can do in this is to believe that in his mysterious ways, divine Providence will utilize the hashtaggers of the world as a tool to help spread awareness to defeat an evil far worse than these Philistines and political opportunists and to also find common cause with the genuinely compassionate among those who consider themselves liberal, Clooney's, Affleck's and others to work for a better future for the people of Africa, a continent which holds so much promise and potential, but is under siege by religious intolerance as well as ineffective and corrupt governments throughout.While our frustration may be justified, we need recall the words of Matthew (6:1) Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven, and leave it to him to decide whose concern is righteous and who is seeking public gain.

As conservatives and political animals, I recognize this is not an easy thing to do. I myself am guilty of the very charges of hypocrisy I have leveled on our opponents throughout this column. It is not the first time these two aspects of my personality have been at odds, thus I try to heed the words in I John 4:20, If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? It is a battle and mystery I will likely fight my entire life as I try to differentiate from the righteous who I simply disagree politically with, and the unrighteous elements within our opposition.

That said, we should take with us the lessons of this episode to evaluate how to best win the public relations battles that, like it or not, our opportunistic opponent will try to capitalize on, as they do with nearly every issue which raises the attention of the masses. Both aspects of our personalities ultimately have common goals and we are increasingly finding has a common foe. The remaining decades of our time on earth will no doubt hold many situations where, as with the persecution of Christians in Africa, our warnings will go unheeded and even mocked by the hashtag hypocrites of the world.

By Paul M Winters

Sources:

MRCTV Breitbart Bible.com



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (784894)5/15/2014 11:55:37 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1573150
 
Taxpayer-funded 'white privilege' conference goes off the rails
..........................................................................

Rick Moran May 15, 2014
americanthinker.com


Attacking white privilege appears to be the latest campus craze. After reading this Mediaite article on a taxpayer funded white privilege conference in Wisconsin, you are probably going to wish that we could return to the days when eating goldfish was all the rage.

Footage of the White Privilege Conference
, obtained by the Education Action Group, features a variety of speakers and organizers confirming cancerous biases by issuing one reckless and tasteless statement after the next.

During a discussion on the nature of white privilege, for example, Iowa University Law Professor Adrien Wing spent a large portion of her time attacking the Supreme Court’s only African-American justice, Clarence Thomas, as a “disgrace to the memory of Thurgood Marshall.”

She went on to attack another prominent African-American figure: President Barack Obama. Wing insisted that, contrary to popular belief, Obama is “the face of global white privilege.”

“He ends up being the front man for the system,” Wing asserted.

“So, instead of just saying were happy there’s a black face in the White House,” she continued, “it’s like, no, the master’s house has now a black face, but it’s still the master’s house. He works for the master of the system of white privilege.”

This is the kind of sentiment which, outside of an academic context, was once considered naked racial antipathy. Similarly, one of the conference’s seminars, “Jews, Class, Race and Power: How It’s All Connected,” might have been labeled anti-Semitic in another era. Fortunately, these speakers and organizers know that racism is something that exists only in the minds of everyone else.

There was also a block of time at this partially taxpayer-funded event dedicated to examining why members of the tea party movement are generally racist.

“There has been a study, a longitudinal study, that finds the longer you are in the tea party, the more racist you become,” said Leonard Zeskind, president of the Institute for Research & Education of Human Rights. He declined to cite his work, but you trust him, right?

Zeskind went on to assert that virtually all white people who live in primarily white neighborhoods are racist. This sentiment was echoed at another seminar on capitalism in which the participants insisted that this system of laissez-faire economics “maintains white supremacy.”

To recap, everything and everyone is racist except, of course, this conference’s race-obsessed speakers and attendees.

Do they understand that just about everyone who isn't besotted with racialist ideology or who views the entire world through a racist prism, thinks they're nuts?

Apparently not:

But the nuttiest moment of them all came at the end of this video when one of the unidentified conference organizers who describe herself as a sociologist escorts the individual taking this video out of a seminar in order to provide the conference’s minority attendees with a “safe space.” She proceeds to confess to him that there is nothing “intrinsically bad” in society, including racial discrimination or sexual violence.

“Would you define discrimination as something intrinsically bad?” the videographer asks.

“No I wouldn’t say it’s intrinsically bad,” she replies.

“Rape isn’t intrinsically bad?” he interjects.

“It’s not,” she replies.

Well, maybe not “intrinsically bad,” but definitely super inconvenient. Maybe she’s erecting an academic context around the concept of rape, like one might call the exploitation of low-lying woodlands along the coast of the Gulf of Guinea a “rape” of sorts… But it’s doubtful.

Wow. Just wow.

As long as this crap was stuck in the Ivory Tower and not polluting the mainstream, they could be tolerated as eccentric professors exercising academic freedom, who needed an issue to study that was easy to make stuff up about. The brilliant thing about studying white privilege is that you are never wrong, no matter how outrageously stupid you sound. Anything, everything, and beyond can be defined, criticizied, and expunged using the white privilege template.

Sounds like a career maker to me.



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (784894)5/15/2014 12:15:41 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573150
 
Its very late......



but a Jobs Corps ...tree planting effort

might be a very good thing

except foe these 'guys'