Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (106066)	5/15/2014 10:27:21 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 219928

Bad stuff. I engage in the kind of legal hair-splitting described in the article every day of the week, often successfully and sometimes not. Stock in trade, no big deal. It's what I get paid to do. The other side gets paid to stop me, and truth arises out of the crucible and the grinding of wheels and mills. But having the law firm which represents GS and in which the Judge's husband is a partner appear before the Judge (even if GS is not a party) is a different matter altogether as GS's interests are obviously at stake. After all, the whistleblower's claim is that GS got away with much bad stuff. It took some serious squirming and pillow-talk for the judge not to recuse herself, even if not prompted to do so by the parties. After all, this is just another case. Why sully her reputation and that of the federal bench? Let some other non-conflicted judge handle it. Stupid.