Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (785072)

5/15/2014 9:58:55 PM

From: koan

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573457

I would also point out, you idiotic nitwit, that the only serious effor to reform SS since Reagan was GWB in 2006. democrats haven't touched it. And won't. Because they can't handle the math.

You say there is no problem with SS yet admit it needs 100B a year to remain solvent for 7.5 decades. That sounds like a pretty damned big problem to me. >>

Little bush pissed away 50 times that amount on nothing but two stupid wars and tax cuts for the rich. that money would have made SS solid for 50 years-lol!

But you said their was zero chance the money would be there and that is nutso thinking. Of course it will be there.

But keep it up.

Mark Pryor, dem of Arkansas was given zero chance of winning his senate seat and was running behind the pub UNTIL he started pointing out his pub appoinant voted for Ryan's medicare voucher system and to increase the age of retirement to 70, and he has now pulled 13 points ahead in a red state.

We dems intend to point out, that every single pub running for senate voted for the same crazy idea of turning medicare into a voucher system and to increase the age to 70. We may win every senate seat this year when people find out what the crazy pubs want to do with SS and medicare.

lol!!