Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Manmade Global Warming, A hoax? A Scam? or a Doomsday Cult? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (4031)	5/23/2014 4:16:53 PM
From: sense	Respond to of 4326

"Doesn't the resolution in a democracy come at the ballot box? Plenty of people who believe in CO2, The Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming, Climate Change, Global Weirding, Heat Hiding in the Ocean or whatever it's called are genuine and are not simply using CO2 as an excuse to create Big Brother." No. Science isn't EVER resolved by elections. That people are genuinely deluded... doesn't mean that being genuine matters more than being deluded ? What people believe isn't overly relevant... in relation to what reality is. Voting to repeal the law of gravity won't actually make gravity stop working. When people are wrong in what they've been LED TO BELIEVE by lying scum bag Democrats... as in the case given the fact that they once believed "if you like your plan, you can keep your plan" and thus voted for Democrats based on Democrats lies ? Having voted based on being scammed by Democrats fraudulent representations... doesn't mean they'll REALLY be able to keep their plans ? And, that they've been duped into believing Democrats frauds on climate, too... doesn't mean Democrats success in lying to people... actually means there is CO2 induced man-made climate change occurring ? However... given PROOF you are being lied to... you should expect that you are being lied to ? So, when Democrats claim there is a consensus backing their policies... the odds are that THEY'RE LYING... is the most reasonable expectation ? "In 2013, Popular Technology contacted some of the scientists cited as belonging to the 97 percent. Craig D. Idso, chairman of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, was one of the scientists whose paper was cited as supporting the argument that humans cause global warming. Asked by the magazine whether his work was properly represented, he said it was "not an accurate representation of my paper" and that it "would be incorrect to claim that our paper was an endorsement of CO2-induced global warming." newsmax.com