Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (785858)	5/22/2014 1:23:23 AM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1583407

Deaths, injuries reported after muslim attack in capital of western China region ap ^ \| May 22, 2014 Xinhua said the assailants plowed through crowds of shoppers in off-road vehicles and threw explosives out the window before crashing head-on in the early morning attack in the city of Urumqi. It said one of the vehicles then exploded and quoted an eyewitness as saying there had been up to a dozen blasts in all. A statement from the Xinjiang regional government said the attack occurred at 7:50 a.m. and people had been killed and injured, but gave no further details. "I heard four or five explosions. I was very scared. I saw three or four people lying on the ground," said Fang Shaoying, the owner of a small supermarket located near the scene of the blast. (Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ... To: BenLurkin . Doesn't that mean "Muslim infested"? 2 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:46:29 PM by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.) [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 1 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: Rashputin Yes, this is China’s Amish territory. 3 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:48:21 PM by Vince Ferrer [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 2 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: BenLurkin I hope China decides to eliminate its Turkic Uighur Muslim population. 100% No remainder 4 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:50:00 PM by LeoWindhorse [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 1 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: BenLurkin This could be interesting, the muslins starting their shiite in a country that is not afraid to go medieval on their a$$es. Time for some popcorn. 5 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:50:09 PM by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!) [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 1 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: BenLurkin Uighurs?? 6 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:50:13 PM by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14) [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 1 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: Vince Ferrer OMH, Amish !!! Those damn rhubarb pie throwing twits !! 7 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:56:12 PM by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory.) [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 3 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: ViLaLuz Just moozlums being moozlums...randomly murdering. Peaceful “religion”, no? 8 posted on 5/21/2014, 11:56:54 PM by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp) To: LeoWindhorse I hope China decides to eliminate its Turkic Uighur Muslim population. 100% No remainder ********************************************************************* The Han Chinese have done similar things in their history when they felt that was an existential need. 11 posted on 5/22/2014, 12:04:24 AM by House Atreides [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 4 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: House Atreides** The Han Chinese have done similar things in their history when they felt that was an existential need.They are sort of doing it now. They have been moving Han Chinese (the majority ethnic group) into Xinjiang for years now, and the Han have recently become the majority. I think a lot of this unrest is that the Amish see themselves as being "gentrified." 12 posted on 5/22/2014, 12:07:50 AM by Vince Ferrer [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 11 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: BenLurkin The Chinese should take no prisoners. 13 posted on 5/22/2014, 12:11:41 AM by moviefan8 [ Post Reply \| Private Reply \| To 1 \| View Replies \| Report Abuse] To: BenLurkin Rabid curs, like the Boston marathon bombers. They should be shot dead on sight. 14 posted on 5/22/2014, 12:15:51 AM by tumblindice

To: longnshort who wrote (785858)	5/22/2014 1:37:14 AM
From: joseffy	Respond to of 1583407

Do You Oppose Gun Control? Eric Holder Knows That You are a Secret Racist Kimberly Paxton www.TheDailySheeple.com May 19th, 2014 If you oppose gun control, you aren’t fooling Attorney General Eric Holder one little bit. You are clearly a racist, and he knows it. Attorney General Eric Holder, who has suggested that critics of the Obama administration are motivated by race and referred to America as a “ nation of cowards“ on race issues while blasting Americans who resist more gun control laws, suggested that those opposed to President Barack Obama’s policy agenda of “fundamental transformation” are quietly prejudiced. In his Saturday commencement address at Morgan State University, a historically black university in Maryland, Holder said that even though there are no more “separate but equal” laws on the 60th anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education decision, the “vestiges of state-sanctioned discrimination continue to reverberate across the country even today.” He said America is done a disservice when they “trade the noisy discord of honest, tough, and vigorous debate for the quiet prejudice of inaction – and the cold silence of consent.” To Holder, dialogue is insufficient to address the “hidden” racism in society but is “a necessary first step that must lead to action.” After comparing Obamacare to the Civil Rights Act of 1965, Holder suggested that those opposed to Obama’s “year of action” are silently displaying their prejudices and suggested that “action” is needed in voting rights, school discipline, and criminal justice reform. He blasted voter ID laws and “zero-tolerance school discipline practices” that “affect black males at a rate three times higher than their white peers.” The Justice Department’s school guideline reforms have been heavily criticized for effectively forcing schools to enact “de facto racial quotas” in school discipline. ( source) So basically, what it boils down to is that if you are white and you disagree with President Obama on anything, it means that you hate black people. It means that if you are in charge of students at a public school, and you punish a black student, then you must immediately seek to punish a white student. Because…quotas, duh. Even those who condemn comments that are considered to be racist in nature, are actually, according to Holder, racist themselves. Even though there was near universal condemnation for Donald Sterling’s and Cliven Bundy’s comments about black Americans, Holder said that was not good enough because the public outrage merely masks “hidden” racism in society. “But we ought not find contentment in the fact that these high-profile expressions of outright bigotry seem atypical and were met with such swift condemnation,” he said. “Because if we focus solely on these incidents – on outlandish statements that capture national attention and spark outrage on Facebook and Twitter – we are likely to miss the more hidden, and more troubling, reality behind the headlines.” ( source) So, face reality, my friends. You’re a racist, I’m a racist, everyone’s a racist. And this is how race wars start. Seems intentional, right? What better way to institute martial law than to crack down on blacks and whites rioting and battling in the streets? Anyway, let me make sure I understand this correctly: the AG doesn’t seem to be too keen on white people? Is he…could he be…oh my gosh, does this mean that Eric Holder is a racist too?

To: longnshort who wrote (785858)	5/22/2014 9:58:30 AM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1583407

Dianne Feinstein compares Benghazi investigators to Benghazi terrorists May 19, 2014 Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) clearly doesn’t want the truth about Benghazi made public By Walid Shoebat \| Freedom Outpost During an appearance on CNN’s State of the Union, Feinstein compared the House Select Committee – not the actual attackers – to a ‘lynch mob.’ As the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Feinstein would have been one of eight members of Congress who received a highly classified ‘annex’ to a bipartisan U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report (SSCI) released earlier this year, according to veteran journalist Seymour Hersh. First, here is Feinstein being a bit melodramatic about why she opposes the Benghazi investigation, using a term to describe House Select Committee investigators that far more accurately describes the Benghazi attackers: Lynch Mob, ... Americans? ... not Islamic Terrorist? .... this woman is Nuts, she belongs in a Nut house. Read more here,... intellihub.com

To: longnshort who wrote (785858)	5/22/2014 2:54:02 PM
From: joseffy	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1583407

Hillary Clinton Already in Control of Democratic Members of Benghazi Panel ...................................................................................... Front Page Magazine ^ \| 5-22-2014 \| Daniel Greenfield The Democratic Party suffers from a complete lack of basic accountability. Its first instinct is to lie and cover up. Hillary Clinton’s world was so worried about a Republican investigation of the Benghazi attacks, they sent a message to House Democrats: We need backup. So Clinton emissaries launched a back channel campaign, contacting several House Democratic lawmakers and aides to say they’d prefer Democrats participate, according to sources familiar with the conversations. Hillary Clinton stacked the first investigation of Benghazi with her people. Now she has managed to do it in Congress. “Republicans are making it clear they plan to use the power of the Benghazi Select Committee to continue to politicize the tragedy that occurred in Benghazi, which is exactly why Democratic participation in the committee is vital,” a Democrat close to Clinton world said. “Inevitably, witnesses ranging from Secretary Clinton to Secretary [John] Kerry will be subpoenaed to testify, and the Democrats appointed to the committee will help restore a level of sanity to the hearings, which would otherwise exist solely as a political witch hunt.” So we’ve got the Clinton-Dem talking points on the table. They don’t intend to investigate the murder of four Americans in any way. They are there to protect Hillary Clinton and accuse any investigators of being crazies engaged in a witch hunt. If Clinton testifies, it will almost certainly be one of the blockbuster moments for the committee and an important prelude as she considers a second run for the White House. She can pound the table some more and shriek, “What difference does it make anyway.” Pelosi picked Reps. Linda Sanchez and Adam Schiff of California, Adam Smith of Washington state and Tammy Duckworth of Illinois to fill the panel. Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, will serve as ranking member. Cummings became notorious for his frenzied obstructionism and tantrums. Linda Sanchez can blame the Vietnamese. Again. Tammy Duckworth will be there to provide cover for the anti-military party as a token. New York Rep. Eliot Engel said Democrats “shouldn’t allow” the investigation to be “made about one person. “I think the American public feels that Hillary Clinton did an outstanding job as secretary of state and if Republicans are using Benghazi to blemish her record, I don’t think it will stick,” Engel said. That must be why no one can seem to name anything Clinton did in office… except Benghazi.