SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (786677)5/29/2014 11:31:43 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577918
 
OBAMA DEFENDS CONTROVERSIAL POLICY OF NOT INVADING COUNTRIES FOR NO REASON

POSTED BY ANDY BOROWITZ
newyorker.com

WEST POINT ( The Borowitz Report)—President Obama raised eyebrows with his West Point commencement address Wednesday by offering a defense of his controversial foreign-policy doctrine of not invading countries for no reason.

Conservative critics were taken aback by Obama’s speech, which was riddled with incendiary remarks about only using military force for a clearly identified and rational purpose.

Obama did not shy away from employing polarizing rhetoric, often using words such as “responsible” and “sensible” to underscore his message.

Harland Dorrinson, a fellow at the conservative think tank the Center for Global Intervention, said that he was “stunned” to see Obama “defend his failure to engage the United States in impulsive and random military adventures.”

“History tells us that the best way to earn respect around the world is by using your military in a totally unpredictable and reckless manner,” he said. “Today, President Obama showed once again that he doesn’t get it.”



To: i-node who wrote (786677)6/14/2014 2:05:03 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1577918
 
>> Conservatives never liked the prior USSC interpretations of the second amendment so when they gained control of the USSC, they changed the interpretation to fit their ideology.

What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand?


What part of we have over 300 million guns circulating in this country do YOU not understand?