SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Carrington Laboratories (CARN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael Theye who wrote (185)12/13/1997 4:59:00 PM
From: Nanny  Respond to of 197
 
Hi, Michael! I couldn't agree with you more when you say "this stock is far from dead". I'm glad to hear that you're going to take the time to do a recap on Carrington for Skane and others 'cause I think a lot of folks either don't know or have forgotten why we started buying Carrington originally!

I think the recent weakness in the price has been from tax loss selling. I know I sold some last month to take the loss and will be buying back before the end of the month. Just hope it stays under $5 til my 31 days are up.

There are just so many good opportunities out there with this recent correction; CARN, PRST, SNRS, TPRO, VVUS! It's hard to know where to start but I think at least 10% of any new money I put in the market now will be Carrington.....and, depending on your recap, that percentage could increase. There's probably a lot of things about this company that I'm not remembering right now!

I know CEO Carlton Turner told me a few months ago that the cancer trials will be moving along in 1998. Can you imagine if just one of their cancer trials proves successful, and they are working on six different types! But their over-the-counter products are enough to make one scratch one's head in amazement as to why there's not more hype about them. Every where I look I see another product with "aloe vera" on the label. I know it's appealing to the consumer but what most people don't know is that Carrnington has taken it a step farther! I mean, who would have thought to patent the carbohydrate extracted from the aloe vera plant....except the brilliant minds at Carrington! The potential for reward seems much greater than the risk from where I sit!

Anxiously awaiting your report!

BTW, how's things in Cincinnati? My friend is vacationing now, last I heard!

Take care!

Nanny



To: Michael Theye who wrote (185)12/17/1997 4:44:00 PM
From: Nanny  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 197
 
Wednesday December 17, 12:18 pm Eastern Time

Company Press Release

Technology in Wound-Healing and Artificial Skin More Advanced Than
Other Biotech Areas, Analyst Says

LOS ANGELES--(BW HealthWire)--Dec. 17, 1997--The niche industry comprised of companies in wound-healing and artificial skin ''is maturing faster than many of the better-known areas'' of biotechnology, according to a newly released research report.

Alexander K. Arrow, vice president of Wedbush Morgan Securities in Los Angeles, made this observation in a report recounting the most recent developments in wound healing and artificial skin and comparing some of the most prominent companies specializing in wound healing.

So rapid has the development in wound healing and artificial skin been that this field is now more advanced than genomics, gene therapy, combinatorial chemistry or peptide drug development, Arrow said.

Arrow's report highlights a total of 28 companies in this new industry segment.

The Wedbush Morgan analyst said the trend from fee-for-service reimbursement to capitated payment already has changed the way health care providers treat patients with skin ulcers. Under a capitated payment system, providers receive a fixed amount for treating a specified number of patients.

''The fee-for-service system encouraged providers to let ulcers occur and then treat them, since the provider simply received a payment for each ulcer treated,'' Arrow said.

''As the transition from fee-for-service to capitated reimbursement accelerates, many providers are or will soon start to take ulcer-prevention steps,'' Arrow further noted, asserting that this approach actually costs providers less than it does to heal ulcers.

Companies making wound care products are responding to this trend, Arrow said. He pointed out that at least one company, MedLogic Global Corp., is selling a protective skin barrier product to prevent ulcers from developing.

For a health care provider using this product on every bedridden ulcer patent, the cost would be less than 1 percent of the expense incurred in treating ulcers after they occur, Arrow said.

Arrow divides the market for artificial skin and wound healing products into three segments: burns and major trauma, minor lacerations and surgical incision closures, and chronic skin ulcers.

The number of patients who need treatment for burns is small and is unlikely to expand, Arrow said, concluding that he doesn't ''believe the burn market alone contains enough potential revenue for a start-up company to grow and prosper.''

The second segment of the artificial skin and wound-healing field consists of sutures used for internal and external wound closure, including planned surgeries and emergency room visits. Annual worldwide expenditures for sutures total about $1.6 billion, and this market will be impacted by biotechnology when the first two wound-closing glues become available next year, according to Arrow.

In contrast, about $7 billion is spent each year on therapy for patients with chronic skin ulcers, Arrow said.

''A skin ulcer is not as life-threatening as a large body surface area burn, but it results in a significant expense to the health care provider,'' Arrow said in his report.

''This is because current skin ulcer treatment involves frequent wound dressing changes and nursing attention over a prolonged period.''

Third-party payers ''are eager for a product that could cut a nine-month course of treatment down to a couple of weeks''
Arrow said.

The public companies described or mentioned in Arrow's report are:

Advanced Tissue Sciences (ATIS), American Home Products Corp. (NYSE:AHP - news; AHP), Baxter Healthcare (BAX),
Biodynamics International Inc. (OTC BB:BDYND - news; BDYN), BioSpecifics Corp. (BSTC), Carrington Laboratories
Inc. (Nasdaq:CARN - news; CARN), Chiron Corp. (Nasdaq:CHIR - news; CHIR), Closure Medical Corp. (Nasdaq:CLSR
- news; CLSR), Curative Health Services (CURE).

Also, Derma Sciences Inc. (Nasdaq:DSCI - news; DSCI), Fusion Medical Technologies Inc. (Nasdaq:FSON - news;
FSON), Genetic Laboratories Wound Care Inc. (OTC BB:GELW - news; GELW), Genzyme Tissue Repair (GENZL),
Human Genome Sciences (HGSI), Integra Life Sciences (IART), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Life Medical Sciences Inc.
(Nasdaq:CHAI - news; CHAI), LifeCell Corp. (LIFC), Magainin Pharmaceuticals (MAGN).

Also, Medtronic (MDT), Novartis (NVTSY), Organogenesis (ORG), Ortec International (ORTC), Orphan Medical
(ORPH), Procyte Corp. (PRCY), Protein Polymer Technologies (PPTI), SmithKline Beecham (SBH), 3M Corp. (MMM).

EDITORS: A copy of Dr. Arrow's report may be obtained by calling 213/688-4521.

Contact:

The Roper Co., Santa Monica, Calif.
Richard Roper, 310/393-0622

More Quotes
and News:
American Home Products Corp (NYSE:AHP - news)
Biodynamics International Inc (OTC BB:BDYND - news)
Carrington Laboratories Inc (Nasdaq:CARN - news)
Chiron Corp (Nasdaq:CHIR - news)
Closure Medical Corp (Nasdaq:CLSR - news)
Derma Sciences Inc (Nasdaq:DSCI - news)
Fusion Medical Technologies Inc (Nasdaq:FSON - news)
Genetic Laboratories Wound Care Inc (OTC BB:GELW - news)
Life Medical Sciences Inc (Nasdaq:CHAI - news)