SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VVUS: VIVUS INC. (NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James Baker who wrote (3562)12/13/1997 9:29:00 AM
From: blankmind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 23519
 
Not sure what you mean by VVUS's "legitimate problems."

-- Here's the worse clip I could find. A downgrade. And '97 earnings are lowered to what: $1.04. And '98 earnings to between $1.30-1.50.

-- James - we're not talking a $100 stock here.

-- I see a 30 to 50% growth rate in profits. $100 mill cash as of 9/30/97. Sales that are nothing short of incredible - as they had next to nothing in '96.

-- So, not sure if VVUS is the next CPQ/DELL - that will quadruple in 12 months. And everyone will ask why they didn't see it coming?

-- SAN FRANCISCO, Dec. 10 /PRNewswire/ -- Genesis Merchant Group Securities analyst D. Curtis Hogue downgraded his rating on Vivus, Inc. (Nasdaq-NNM: VVUS - news) to long-term buy from strong buy based on the uncertainty surrounding the company's ability to manage the transition from one production facility to two facilities.

Hogue noted, ''Our 1998 EPS estimates and price target are currently under review, but we anticipate having to lower these numbers significantly. Based on our initial analysis, we estimate an EPS range of $1.30 to $1.50 for 1998.''

Hogue is lowering his full year and Q4 estimates for 1997 as well. Product revenue estimates for Q4 1997 are dropping to $28.6 million from $39.5 million and Q4 EPS estimates are being lowered to $0.18 per share from $0.34. ''This effectively lowers our 1997 EPS estimate from $1.21 to $1.04 per share,'' he added.



To: James Baker who wrote (3562)12/13/1997 1:28:00 PM
From: Linda Kaplan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 23519
 
Jim,

I think all the stockholders should know what we're up against. I don't believe in suppressing news, whether good or bad. The truth is important to me, and I'm sure most stockholders also want to know what's going on. How can we refute anything if our information has been censored?

Do you think it would help us if we were hearing bits of the Arsenio attacks from others but we hadn't read it ourselves and discussed the validity of it?

Linda