Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stsimon who wrote (184274)

6/4/2014 4:35:38 PM

From: Bearcatbob

7 Recommendations

Recommended By
Ben Smith
Hannoverian
Joe Btfsplk
old tx oiler
quehubo

and 2 more members

Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206180

"The federal government is designed to be inefficient because of the separation of powers the founding fathers built into the constitution. "

I completely disagree. The federal government was designed to make radical change impossible as opposed to that possible with the parliamentary form of government where the winning party rules. For instance, Canada is an NDP government away from utter ruin - despite how well they are doing today (Ontario only neededa Liberal gove to achieve unsustainable debt). Change with the brilliant system defined by our founders will be incremental - not radical.

That said, there is NOTHING associated with slow change that justifies idiocy. Utter incompetence like the VA has absolutely NOTHING to do with the system defined by our founding fathers. Blaming current clown show in the White House on the founding fathers is a joke.

Bob