Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (53583)	6/10/2014 11:48:13 AM
From: Wharf Rat	1 Recommendation Recommended By Eric Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86355

USHCN Temperature Adjustments Are Not Credible Posted on June 6, 2014 by stevengoddard Goddard is projecting. He is the one without credibility. Even Watts says that. Ya gotta be pretty incredibly uncredible for Watts to say that. Anthony Watts (Comment #130003) June 6th, 2014 at 8:00 am I took Goddard to task over this as well in a private email, saying he was very wrong and needed to do better. I also pointed out to him that his initial claim was wronger than wrong, as he was claiming that 40% of USCHN STATIONS were missing. Predictably, he swept that under the rug, and then proceeded to tell me in email that I don’t know what I’m talking about. Fortunately I saved screen caps from his original post and the edit he made afterwards. Message 29569696