SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RMF who wrote (788455)6/8/2014 1:16:37 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576163
 
We really could, if we made a Manhattan-project level effort, get all the energy we need from wind and solar. The main problem is that the wind doesn't always blow, nor does the sun shine every day, so we need ultra-large scale ways to store energy to draw on for those times. People are working that problem now.

en.wikipedia.org



To: RMF who wrote (788455)6/8/2014 1:26:23 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1576163
 
That makes you ONE that isn't anti-nuke.

As far as saying CO2 is not a global warming gas that's just absurd.

My opinion is it's a close to insignificant warming influence .... there just isn't that much CO2 in the atmosphere.

That the atmosphere had plant starvation levels of CO2 during the last ice age is worrisome since there WILL be another ice age coming. We should hope the CO2 level in the atmosphere is higher then.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News